* [PATCH] ext4: silence an uninitialized variable warning
@ 2020-10-30 11:46 Dan Carpenter
2020-11-07 3:23 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2020-10-30 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Theodore Ts'o, Harshad Shirwadkar
Cc: Andreas Dilger, linux-ext4, kernel-janitors
Smatch complains that "i" can be uninitialized if we don't enter the
loop. I don't know if it's possible but we may as well silence this
warning.
Fixes: 8016e29f4362 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 85abbfb98cbe..9e8faf851c59 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -5167,7 +5167,7 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(handle_t *handle,
struct super_block *sb = ar->inode->i_sb;
ext4_group_t group;
ext4_grpblk_t blkoff;
- int i;
+ int i = 0;
ext4_fsblk_t goal, block;
struct ext4_super_block *es = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es;
--
2.28.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: silence an uninitialized variable warning
2020-10-30 11:46 [PATCH] ext4: silence an uninitialized variable warning Dan Carpenter
@ 2020-11-07 3:23 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Y. Ts'o @ 2020-11-07 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: Harshad Shirwadkar, Andreas Dilger, linux-ext4, kernel-janitors
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 02:46:20PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that "i" can be uninitialized if we don't enter the
> loop. I don't know if it's possible but we may as well silence this
> warning.
Thanks, applied.
I changed the patch so that i gets initialized to sb->s_blocksize
instead of 0. The only way the for loop could be skipped entirely,
leaving i initialized, is if the in-memory data structures, in
particular the bh->b_data for the on-disk superblock has gotten
corrupted enough that calculated value of group is >= to
ext4_get_groups_count(sb). In that case, we want to exit immediately
without allocating a block, and if i is left to sb->s_blocksize, that
will cause the function to bail out right after the skipped for loop.
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-07 3:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-30 11:46 [PATCH] ext4: silence an uninitialized variable warning Dan Carpenter
2020-11-07 3:23 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).