From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:20:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210106172033.GA2165@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210106135253.GJ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:52:53PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:53:59AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > ... and are you using defconfig or something else?
>
> Not sure I replied to this. I'm not using the defconfig, I've my own
> .config
>
> As I mentioned, Will has built a 5.10 kernel using Arnd's gcc 4.9.4
> and hasn't been able to reproduce it. He's sent me his kernel, which
> I've booted here, and haven't yet been able to provoke it.
>
> Meanwhile, my 5.9 kernel continues to exhibit this problem, so I've
> sent Will my .config (which I'll include here.) There are differences
> in some of the block layer configuration. There's differences in the
> errata configuration, but we don't think that's a cause (they're not
> relevant for Cortex A72).
>
> Our plan is:
> - Will is switching to 5.9, and using my config as a base for his
> platform.
> - Will is going to send me his modified version of my config.
> - We are both going to build using the same kernel sources and same
> config.
> - We are going to test our own kernels, and also swap kernel images
> and test each others.
>
> Watch this space for more news...
I've managed to reproduce the corruption on my AMD Seattle board (8x A57).
I haven't had a chance to dig deeper yet, but here's the recipe which works
for me:
1. I'm using GCC 4.9.4 simply to try to get as close as I can to rmk's
setup. I don't know if this is necessary or not, but the toolchain is
here:
https://kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/arm64/4.9.4/arm64-gcc-4.9.4-nolibc-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz
and I needed to pull down an old libmpfr to get cc1 to work:
http://ports.ubuntu.com/pool/main/m/mpfr4/libmpfr4_3.1.2-1_arm64.deb
2. I build a 5.9 kernel with the config here:
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/will/bugs/rmk/config-5.9.0
and the resulting Image is here:
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/will/bugs/rmk/Image-5.9.0
3. Using that kernel, I boot into a 64-bit Debian 10 filesystem and open a
couple of terminals over SSH.
4. In one terminal, I run:
$ while (true); do find /var /usr /bin /sbin -type f -print0 | xargs -0
md5sum > /dev/null; echo 2 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; done
(note that sudo will prompt you for a password on the first iteration)
5. In the other terminal, I run:
$ while (true); do ./hackbench ; sleep 1; done
where hackbench is built from:
https://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/hackbench.c
and compiled according to comment in the source code.
With that, I see the following after ten seconds or so:
EXT4-fs error (device sda2): ext4_lookup:1707: inode #674497: comm md5sum: iget: checksum invalid
Russell, Mark -- does this recipe explode reliably for you too?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-06 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-05 15:47 Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-05 18:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-05 19:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 11:53 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-06 12:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 13:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 17:20 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-01-06 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-06 21:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-06 22:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-06 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 11:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-07 13:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 16:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-01-07 17:00 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-07 21:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-07 22:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-07 22:41 ` Eric Biggers
2021-01-08 8:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-01-07 22:27 ` Eric Biggers
2021-01-07 23:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-08 8:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-08 10:31 ` Pavel Machek
2021-01-07 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-08 9:26 ` Will Deacon
2021-01-08 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-08 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08 21:20 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-08 20:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-12 13:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-01-12 13:31 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-12 13:46 ` David Laight
2021-01-12 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-14 13:13 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210106172033.GA2165@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox