From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Alexander Lochmann <alexander.lochmann@tu-dortmund.de>
Cc: Horst Schirmeier <horst.schirmeier@tu-dortmund.de>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Updated locking documentation for transaction_t
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:30:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210211093027.GI19070@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210210095740.54881-2-alexander.lochmann@tu-dortmund.de>
On Wed 10-02-21 10:57:39, Alexander Lochmann wrote:
> Some members of transaction_t are allowed to be read without
> any lock being held if consistency doesn't matter.
> Based on LockDoc's findings, we extended the locking
> documentation of those members.
> Each one of them is marked with a short comment:
> "no lock for quick racy checks".
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lochmann <alexander.lochmann@tu-dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier <horst.schirmeier@tu-dortmund.de>
Thanks for the patch! Some comments below...
> ---
> include/linux/jbd2.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> index 99d3cd051ac3..18f77d9b1745 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jbd2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> @@ -594,18 +594,18 @@ struct transaction_s
> */
> unsigned long t_log_start;
>
> - /* Number of buffers on the t_buffers list [j_list_lock] */
> + /* Number of buffers on the t_buffers list [j_list_lock, no lock for quick racy checks] */
> int t_nr_buffers;
So this case is actually somewhat different now that I audited the uses.
There are two types of users - commit code (fs/jbd2/commit.c) and others.
Other users properly use j_list_lock to access t_nr_buffers. Commit code
does not use any locks because committing transaction is fully in
ownership of the jbd2 thread and all other users need to check & wait for
commit to be finished before doing anything with the transaction's buffers.
> /*
> * Doubly-linked circular list of all buffers reserved but not yet
> - * modified by this transaction [j_list_lock]
> + * modified by this transaction [j_list_lock, no lock for quick racy checks]
> */
> struct journal_head *t_reserved_list;
>
> /*
> * Doubly-linked circular list of all metadata buffers owned by this
> - * transaction [j_list_lock]
> + * transaction [j_list_lock, no lock for quick racy checks]
> */
> struct journal_head *t_buffers;
>
> @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ struct transaction_s
> /*
> * Doubly-linked circular list of metadata buffers being shadowed by log
> * IO. The IO buffers on the iobuf list and the shadow buffers on this
> - * list match each other one for one at all times. [j_list_lock]
> + * list match each other one for one at all times. [j_list_lock, no lock for quick racy checks]
> */
> struct journal_head *t_shadow_list;
The above three cases are the same as t_reserved_list.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-11 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-10 9:57 [PATCH 2/2] Updated locking documentation for journal_t Alexander Lochmann
2021-02-10 9:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] Updated locking documentation for transaction_t Alexander Lochmann
2021-02-11 9:30 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2021-02-11 9:53 ` Alexander Lochmann
2021-02-11 13:13 ` Jan Kara
2021-03-26 8:18 ` Alexander Lochmann
2021-03-29 10:14 ` Jan Kara
2021-02-11 9:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] Updated locking documentation for journal_t Jan Kara
2021-02-11 9:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexander Lochmann
2021-03-17 20:57 ` Alexander Lochmann
2021-04-02 15:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-10 9:56 [PATCH 1/2] Updated locking documentation for transaction_t Alexander Lochmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210211093027.GI19070@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=alexander.lochmann@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=horst.schirmeier@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).