From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E797C433DB for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF8E64EBD for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1383660AbhCCPci (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:32:38 -0500 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:13426 "EHLO szxga06-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346386AbhCCNKv (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 08:10:51 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DrDpH5by9zjTHv; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 21:08:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 21:09:54 +0800 From: "zhangyi (F)" To: CC: , , , Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] ext4: find old entry again if failed to rename whiteout Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 21:17:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20210303131703.330415-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org If we failed to add new entry on rename whiteout, we cannot reset the old->de entry directly, because the old->de could have moved from under us during make indexed dir. So find the old entry again before reset is needed, otherwise it may corrupt the filesystem as below. /dev/sda: Entry '00000001' in ??? (12) has deleted/unused inode 15. CLEARED. /dev/sda: Unattached inode 75 /dev/sda: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Fixes: 6b4b8e6b4ad ("ext4: fix bug for rename with RENAME_WHITEOUT") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) --- fs/ext4/namei.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c index cf652ba3e74d..17d9400563fa 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c @@ -3602,6 +3602,31 @@ static int ext4_setent(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent, return retval; } +static void ext4_resetent(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent, + unsigned ino, unsigned file_type) +{ + struct ext4_renament old = *ent; + int retval = 0; + + /* + * old->de could have moved from under us during make indexed dir, + * so the old->de may no longer valid and need to find it again + * before reset old inode info. + */ + old.bh = ext4_find_entry(old.dir, &old.dentry->d_name, &old.de, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(old.bh)) + retval = PTR_ERR(old.bh); + if (!old.bh) + retval = -ENOENT; + if (retval) { + ext4_std_error(old.dir->i_sb, retval); + return; + } + + ext4_setent(handle, &old, ino, file_type); + brelse(old.bh); +} + static int ext4_find_delete_entry(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *d_name) { @@ -3924,8 +3949,8 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, end_rename: if (whiteout) { if (retval) { - ext4_setent(handle, &old, - old.inode->i_ino, old_file_type); + ext4_resetent(handle, &old, + old.inode->i_ino, old_file_type); drop_nlink(whiteout); } unlock_new_inode(whiteout); -- 2.25.4