From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To: amir73il@gmail.com
Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
jack@suse.com, dhowells@redhat.com, khazhy@google.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] inotify: Don't force FS_IN_IGNORED
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 22:41:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521024134.1032503-6-krisman@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521024134.1032503-1-krisman@collabora.com>
According to Amir:
"FS_IN_IGNORED is completely internal to inotify and there is no need
to set it in i_fsnotify_mask at all, so if we remove the bit from the
output of inotify_arg_to_mask() no functionality will change and we will
be able to overload the event bit for FS_ERROR."
This is done in preparation to overload FS_ERROR with the notification
mechanism in fanotify.
Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
---
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
index 98f61b31745a..4d17be6dd58d 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ static inline __u32 inotify_arg_to_mask(struct inode *inode, u32 arg)
__u32 mask;
/*
- * Everything should accept their own ignored and should receive events
- * when the inode is unmounted. All directories care about children.
+ * Everything should receive events when the inode is unmounted.
+ * All directories care about children.
*/
- mask = (FS_IN_IGNORED | FS_UNMOUNT);
+ mask = (FS_UNMOUNT);
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
mask |= FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD;
--
2.31.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 2:41 [PATCH 00/11] File system wide monitoring Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] fanotify: Fold event size calculation to its own function Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] fanotify: Split fsid check from other fid mode checks Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 8:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] fanotify: Simplify directory sanity check in DFID_NAME mode Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 8:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] fanotify: Expose fanotify_mark Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 9:06 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 2:41 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2021-05-21 9:07 ` [PATCH 05/11] inotify: Don't force FS_IN_IGNORED Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] fsnotify: Support FS_ERROR event type Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 9:13 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] fsnotify: Introduce helpers to send error_events Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 9:32 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] fanotify: Introduce FAN_ERROR event Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 11:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 15:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] ext4: Send notifications on error Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 9:44 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] samples: Add fs error monitoring example Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 9:48 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-26 23:37 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 2:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] Documentation: Document the FAN_ERROR event Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-21 9:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-21 8:31 ` [PATCH 00/11] File system wide monitoring Amir Goldstein
2021-05-22 23:25 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2021-05-24 15:19 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-05-24 3:06 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210521024134.1032503-6-krisman@collabora.com \
--to=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox