From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] generic/620: Remove -b blocksize option for ext4
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 15:31:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210708100126.hpocb3ukarnzzdbh@riteshh-domain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNyku9CJ3YImhkMA@mit.edu>
On 21/06/30 01:07PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:58:11AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > ext4 with 64k blocksize fails with below error for this given test which
> > requires dmhugedisk. Also since dax is not supported for this test, so
> > make sure to remove -b option, if set by config file for ext4 FSTYP for
> > the test to then use 4K blocksize by default.
> >
> > mkfs.ext4: Input/output error while writing out and closing file system
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Looking at this test, I'm not convinced it actually does the right
> thing when the block size is 64k, since the whole point is to test
> what happens when the block number > INT_MAX. So we should be able to
> fix the block size to be 1k, which would allow us to use a smaller
> dmhugedisk, and then skip this test if dax is enabled.
>
> OTOH, generic/620 runs pretty quicky, so perhaps it's better to do
> thie quick fix: hardcode the block size to 4k, and then skip it if dax
> && page_size != 4k.
Ok, so it is time to implement _mkfs_dev_blocksized() something like how we have
for _scratch_mkfs_blocksized(). This is since we can have different way of
passing blocksize parameter for mkfs prog for different filesystems.
-ritesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-14 6:28 [PATCH 0/9] 64K blocksize related fixes Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 1/9] ext4/003: Fix this test on 64K platform for dax config Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 16:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-07-08 6:24 ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-07-08 12:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 2/9] ext4/027: Correct the right code of block and inode bitmap Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-14 16:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 3/9] ext4/306: Add -b blocksize parameter too to avoid failure with DAX config Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 16:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 4/9] ext4/022: exclude this test for dax config on 64KB pagesize platform Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 16:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 5/9] generic/031: Fix the test case for 64k blocksize config Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 15:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-30 17:18 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-07-08 9:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 6/9] gitignore: Add 031.out file to .gitignore Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 16:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 7/9] generic/620: Remove -b blocksize option for ext4 Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 17:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-07-08 10:01 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 8/9] common/attr: Cleanup end of line whitespaces issues Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 15:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-30 17:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-06-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 9/9] common/attr: Reduce MAX_ATTRS to leave some overhead for 64K blocksize Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 15:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-30 19:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-07-09 5:12 ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-06-30 13:30 ` [PATCH 0/9] 64K blocksize related fixes Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210708100126.hpocb3ukarnzzdbh@riteshh-domain \
--to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).