From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/5] ext4: init 'seq' with the value which set in 'ext4_multi_mount_protect'
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:53:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211019085319.GA3255@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019064959.625557-2-yebin10@huawei.com>
On Tue 19-10-21 14:49:55, Ye Bin wrote:
> If two host have the same nodename, and seq start from 0, May cause the
> detection mechanism to fail.
> So init 'seq' with the value which set in 'ext4_multi_mount_protect' to
> accelerate conflict detection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
...
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static int kmmpd(void *data)
> mmp_block = le64_to_cpu(es->s_mmp_block);
> mmp = (struct mmp_struct *)(bh->b_data);
> mmp->mmp_time = cpu_to_le64(ktime_get_real_seconds());
> + seq = le32_to_cpu(mmp->mmp_seq);
> /*
> * Start with the higher mmp_check_interval and reduce it if
> * the MMP block is being updated on time.
Thanks for the patch. After discussing what MMP guards against and what it
does not protect, I don't think this change is actually needed. Under
normal conditions we expect kmmpd() to only write to MMP block, checking of
MMP block is done only in ext4_multi_mount_protect(). And for checking
there to trigger, using 'seq' starting from 1 in kmmpd is enough...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-19 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-19 6:49 [PATCH -next v3 0/5] Fix some issues about mmp Ye Bin
2021-10-19 6:49 ` [PATCH -next v3 1/5] ext4: init 'seq' with the value which set in 'ext4_multi_mount_protect' Ye Bin
2021-10-19 8:53 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2021-10-19 6:49 ` [PATCH -next v3 2/5] ext4: compare to local seq and nodename when check conflict Ye Bin
2021-10-19 8:54 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-19 6:49 ` [PATCH -next v3 3/5] ext4: get buffer head before read_mmp_block Ye Bin
2021-10-19 9:12 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-19 6:49 ` [PATCH -next v3 4/5] ext4: simplify read_mmp_block fucntion Ye Bin
2021-10-19 13:13 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-19 6:49 ` [PATCH -next v3 5/5] ext4: avoid to re-read mmp check data get from page cache Ye Bin
2021-10-19 9:10 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211019085319.GA3255@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).