Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, chenlong <chenlongcl.chen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] ext4/054: Should we remove auto and quick group?
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:06:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220126073659.zo2znw273jr6i6rs@riteshh-domain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfBY2pMmEFPb+qCF@mit.edu>

On 22/01/25 03:08PM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:32:01AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > Hello Zhang/Ted,
> >
> > Looks like the issue fixed by patches at [1], were observed with fault injection
> > testing and with errors=continue mount option. But were not cc'd to stable.
> >
> > Do you think those should be cc'd to stable tree?
>
> I already requested that they be backported, and they are in 5.10.89+
> and 5.15.12+.  Unfortunately the patches don't backport cleanly into
> 5.4, and while I did the manual backport for 5.10, I haven't gotten
> around to backporting them into 5.4 or older kernels.
>

Sure Ted, thanks a lot for the backport and for providing above information.

-ritesh

      reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25  6:02 [RFC 0/1] ext4/054: Should we remove auto and quick group? Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-25  6:02 ` [RFC 1/1] ext4/054: Remove auto and quick group Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-25  7:43 ` [RFC 0/1] ext4/054: Should we remove auto and quick group? Eryu Guan
2022-01-26  7:38   ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-25 20:08 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2022-01-26  7:36   ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220126073659.zo2znw273jr6i6rs@riteshh-domain \
    --to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chenlongcl.chen@huawei.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox