From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214BCC63682 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229821AbiAZHiU (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 02:38:20 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:10928 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229676AbiAZHiT (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 02:38:19 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 20Q7WSE9005033; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:12 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=hdvhbb2jV5lKn9JGTFzMuv1jyH3Xr+Fz6n3lDspxOW8=; b=S7bC09JX07Cm5EOEoBkUBrjKQoX/jL9nbXArHLWPXoKs+8WVpxAkmwoT+eWV7YT8zp+n dT4mxwWMyJWDki45+J9s09fb2xh9blLQy47hmLye/rN0dKH2HXjycVGW0o/mycMvOsLQ /cVOkAnPhX/flap32AmgZaiypu8ZQYySUsXRtiMOpUdxwogxknhitttztDSWJQMU6yYD jrX48E/CnQ2uA3ViUnkCjI/G01hnoPqISZAFzoho+GH6ErmWpsehTQ9vIglKcoXkIGTC clCbq2vwNBGMsxWRPzl0BZVT1763Z/H0eqTMQnVOOyxTFy5bsTnbIXsQ542AOquvvnG6 dA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3dtwa9vqyc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:12 +0000 Received: from m0098416.ppops.net (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 20Q7P3Eb010235; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:11 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3dtwa9vqy0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:11 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 20Q7WPcA030562; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:10 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3dr96jm0fr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:10 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 20Q7c7ga41681400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:07 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA531A404D; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692C8A4053; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.43.37.89]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:06 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:08:04 +0530 From: Ritesh Harjani To: Eryu Guan Cc: fstests , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Yi , tytso@mit.edu, Jan Kara , chenlong Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] ext4/054: Should we remove auto and quick group? Message-ID: <20220126073804.qtrzaru4v2dhgagm@riteshh-domain> References: <20220125074325.GB12255@e18g06458.et15sqa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220125074325.GB12255@e18g06458.et15sqa> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: EB6RnLuqBbw9-qZPfXr57wgGfzt_c7r2 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: TWlNsImm8ocwDbMypmOuYkqNScBELgG1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-01-26_01,2022-01-25_02,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=922 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2201260040 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 22/01/25 03:43PM, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:32:01AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > > Hello Zhang/Ted, > > > > Looks like the issue fixed by patches at [1], were observed with fault injection > > testing and with errors=continue mount option. But were not cc'd to stable. > > > > Do you think those should be cc'd to stable tree? > > > > Meanwhile, I was thinking we should anyway remove auto and quick group from this > > test as it could trigger a bug on in older kernel targets. Thoughts? > > IMO, ext4/054 is a targeted regression test and should be in auto group, > which ensures the bug doesn't get re-introduced in future. Yes, I agree with it. > > I think you could just skip this test to fit your kernel version, e.g. > > echo ext4/054 > ext4.exclude > ./check -X ext4.exclude Sure, thanks Eryu. -ritesh