From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33596C4332F for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236350AbiCOOXY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 10:23:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50274 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349220AbiCOOXH (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 10:23:07 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6AB154BEB; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 07:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 22FDLNY5027491; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:21:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=UO7/JBIo4u9pbWv7oF+ML0pIWM8AZ+nHbnMD9rkZDtc=; b=WBvLRhGyqyMeUvd5lP9sCpHhmeMHrf1U1z+CuurRWQGQsj464MMZcJJePjc2GMzj3I1j +dExVVW+YqNfe3neEDjlNoYQezED5dliEsX5yGhBr1zL5sDX6bBkDy0ipHECVg+zVmrE hUniK9IqZ7o7nafK42JzshK6CTMQHWWEiC6qqfxkii4VPkFwB9HipsHhF7gPdJJkc5s0 qeTIvV4bX/3cQjNLhtnBwSTu0tREf7W3+KBEjpsuMMK3JuIVpbkUjRoK+6uvNlAU56h8 827fulBOJl+t0j1T+YfAmTfAnpgGsuDgNO9dclWaqVIfRRmTWwhIsxx/K4IRfTIR4H1X Aw== Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3etum21ecu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:21:52 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 22FE9IHL013267; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:21:51 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3erk58xthx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:21:50 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 22FELmFX56754590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:21:48 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62DF52051; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:21:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.43.32.151]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171625204E; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:21:47 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:51:46 +0530 From: Ritesh Harjani To: Ojaswin Mujoo Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Get rid of unused DEFAULT_MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN Message-ID: <20220315142146.swjkethfy2befsq4@riteshh-domain> References: <20220315114454.104182-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220315114454.104182-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: fcwmrIQixyoj741kyo_bq-DIfTCjyWp7 X-Proofpoint-GUID: fcwmrIQixyoj741kyo_bq-DIfTCjyWp7 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.850,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-03-15_03,2022-03-15_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=520 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203150092 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 22/03/15 05:14PM, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote: > After recent changes to the mb_optimize_scan mount option > the DEFAULT_MB_OPTIMIZE_SCAN is no longer needed so get > rid of it. Thanks for doing this. Looks good to me. Feel free to add - Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani