From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3A0C433EF for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 15:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355880AbiELPWI (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 11:22:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49724 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245501AbiELPWH (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 11:22:07 -0400 Received: from joooj.vinc17.net (joooj.vinc17.net [155.133.131.76]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0995F26D for ; Thu, 12 May 2022 08:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-zira.vinc17.net (128.119.75.86.rev.sfr.net [86.75.119.128]) by joooj.vinc17.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 225D72DA; Thu, 12 May 2022 17:22:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by zira.vinc17.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DD21B2800285; Thu, 12 May 2022 17:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 17:22:02 +0200 From: Vincent Lefevre To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext4: unexpected delayed file creation with a 5.17 kernel Message-ID: <20220512152202.GE3360150@zira.vinc17.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vincent Lefevre , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: <20220511135917.GA3381602@zira.vinc17.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Mailer-Info: https://www.vinc17.net/mutt/ User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.4+14 (d448c911) vl-138565 (2022-05-08) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On 2022-05-12 10:52:34 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 03:59:17PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On a Linux machine (12-core x86_64 Debian/unstable, 5.17 kernel) > > with an ext4 filesystem, I got a file born 30 seconds after its > > actual creation by a script. This is completely unreproducible. > > completely *reproducible* or *unreproducible*? Completely unreproducible. This was the only time I noticed such an issue with ext4. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)