* [PATCH 0/2 v2] ext4: Fix crash when adding entry to corrupted directory @ 2022-05-18 9:33 Jan Kara 2022-05-18 9:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Verify dir block before splitting it Jan Kara 2022-05-18 9:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree Jan Kara 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Kara @ 2022-05-18 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ted Tso; +Cc: linux-ext4, Jan Kara Hello, two patches in this series try to fix a crash when adding directory entry to a directory with corrupted h-tree. Since I don't have the filesystem image causing the crash, I'm not sure what was the cause but the stacktrace suggests we have corrupted one h-tree node while modifying another one so likely there was a cycle created in the h-tree. This series checks for it and bails out early. Changes since v1: * Fixed compilation error in the first patch (which got fixed in the second patch) * Fixed stack corruption issue with largedir feature Honza Previous versions: Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428180355.15209-1-jack@suse.cz # v1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Verify dir block before splitting it 2022-05-18 9:33 [PATCH 0/2 v2] ext4: Fix crash when adding entry to corrupted directory Jan Kara @ 2022-05-18 9:33 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-19 2:16 ` Theodore Ts'o 2022-05-18 9:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree Jan Kara 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Kara @ 2022-05-18 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ted Tso; +Cc: linux-ext4, Jan Kara, stable Before splitting a directory block verify its directory entries are sane so that the splitting code does not access memory it should not. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- fs/ext4/namei.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c index 767b4bfe39c3..2a55f23e4524 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c @@ -277,9 +277,9 @@ static struct dx_frame *dx_probe(struct ext4_filename *fname, struct dx_hash_info *hinfo, struct dx_frame *frame); static void dx_release(struct dx_frame *frames); -static int dx_make_map(struct inode *dir, struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de, - unsigned blocksize, struct dx_hash_info *hinfo, - struct dx_map_entry map[]); +static int dx_make_map(struct inode *dir, struct buffer_head *bh, + struct dx_hash_info *hinfo, + struct dx_map_entry *map_tail); static void dx_sort_map(struct dx_map_entry *map, unsigned count); static struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *dx_move_dirents(struct inode *dir, char *from, char *to, struct dx_map_entry *offsets, @@ -1249,15 +1249,23 @@ static inline int search_dirblock(struct buffer_head *bh, * Create map of hash values, offsets, and sizes, stored at end of block. * Returns number of entries mapped. */ -static int dx_make_map(struct inode *dir, struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de, - unsigned blocksize, struct dx_hash_info *hinfo, +static int dx_make_map(struct inode *dir, struct buffer_head *bh, + struct dx_hash_info *hinfo, struct dx_map_entry *map_tail) { int count = 0; - char *base = (char *) de; + struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de = (struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *)bh->b_data; + unsigned int buflen = bh->b_size; + char *base = bh->b_data; struct dx_hash_info h = *hinfo; - while ((char *) de < base + blocksize) { + if (ext4_has_metadata_csum(dir->i_sb)) + buflen -= sizeof(struct ext4_dir_entry_tail); + + while ((char *) de < base + buflen) { + if (ext4_check_dir_entry(dir, NULL, de, bh, base, buflen, + ((char *)de) - base)) + return -EFSCORRUPTED; if (de->name_len && de->inode) { if (ext4_hash_in_dirent(dir)) h.hash = EXT4_DIRENT_HASH(de); @@ -1270,8 +1278,7 @@ static int dx_make_map(struct inode *dir, struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de, count++; cond_resched(); } - /* XXX: do we need to check rec_len == 0 case? -Chris */ - de = ext4_next_entry(de, blocksize); + de = ext4_next_entry(de, dir->i_sb->s_blocksize); } return count; } @@ -1943,8 +1950,11 @@ static struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *do_split(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir, /* create map in the end of data2 block */ map = (struct dx_map_entry *) (data2 + blocksize); - count = dx_make_map(dir, (struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *) data1, - blocksize, hinfo, map); + count = dx_make_map(dir, *bh, hinfo, map); + if (count < 0) { + err = count; + goto journal_error; + } map -= count; dx_sort_map(map, count); /* Ensure that neither split block is over half full */ -- 2.35.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Verify dir block before splitting it 2022-05-18 9:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Verify dir block before splitting it Jan Kara @ 2022-05-19 2:16 ` Theodore Ts'o 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2022-05-19 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kara; +Cc: Theodore Ts'o, stable, linux-ext4 On Wed, 18 May 2022 11:33:28 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Before splitting a directory block verify its directory entries are sane > so that the splitting code does not access memory it should not. > > Applied, thanks! [1/2] ext4: Verify dir block before splitting it commit: dfd094204c1f5bb4b1772bade3769cc92b645f1b [2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree commit: 01db66b58446cd7372c4f29324d270b4cd15157d Best regards, -- Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree 2022-05-18 9:33 [PATCH 0/2 v2] ext4: Fix crash when adding entry to corrupted directory Jan Kara 2022-05-18 9:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Verify dir block before splitting it Jan Kara @ 2022-05-18 9:33 ` Jan Kara 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Kara @ 2022-05-18 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ted Tso; +Cc: linux-ext4, Jan Kara, stable A maliciously corrupted filesystem can contain cycles in the h-tree stored inside a directory. That can easily lead to the kernel corrupting tree nodes that were already verified under its hands while doing a node split and consequently accessing unallocated memory. Fix the problem by verifying traversed block numbers are unique. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- fs/ext4/namei.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c index 2a55f23e4524..2ca99f1569c0 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c @@ -777,12 +777,14 @@ static struct dx_frame * dx_probe(struct ext4_filename *fname, struct inode *dir, struct dx_hash_info *hinfo, struct dx_frame *frame_in) { - unsigned count, indirect; + unsigned count, indirect, level, i; struct dx_entry *at, *entries, *p, *q, *m; struct dx_root *root; struct dx_frame *frame = frame_in; struct dx_frame *ret_err = ERR_PTR(ERR_BAD_DX_DIR); u32 hash; + ext4_lblk_t block; + ext4_lblk_t blocks[EXT4_HTREE_LEVEL]; memset(frame_in, 0, EXT4_HTREE_LEVEL * sizeof(frame_in[0])); frame->bh = ext4_read_dirblock(dir, 0, INDEX); @@ -854,6 +856,8 @@ dx_probe(struct ext4_filename *fname, struct inode *dir, } dxtrace(printk("Look up %x", hash)); + level = 0; + blocks[0] = 0; while (1) { count = dx_get_count(entries); if (!count || count > dx_get_limit(entries)) { @@ -882,15 +886,27 @@ dx_probe(struct ext4_filename *fname, struct inode *dir, dx_get_block(at))); frame->entries = entries; frame->at = at; - if (!indirect--) + + block = dx_get_block(at); + for (i = 0; i <= level; i++) { + if (blocks[i] == block) { + ext4_warning_inode(dir, + "dx entry: tree cycle block %u points back to block %u", + blocks[level], block); + goto fail; + } + } + if (++level > indirect) return frame; + blocks[level] = block; frame++; - frame->bh = ext4_read_dirblock(dir, dx_get_block(at), INDEX); + frame->bh = ext4_read_dirblock(dir, block, INDEX); if (IS_ERR(frame->bh)) { ret_err = (struct dx_frame *) frame->bh; frame->bh = NULL; goto fail; } + entries = ((struct dx_node *) frame->bh->b_data)->entries; if (dx_get_limit(entries) != dx_node_limit(dir)) { -- 2.35.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/2] ext4: Fix crash when adding entry to corrupted directory @ 2022-04-28 18:31 Jan Kara 2022-04-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree Jan Kara 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Kara @ 2022-04-28 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ted Tso; +Cc: linux-ext4, Jan Kara Hello, two patches in this series try to fix a crash when adding directory entry to a directory with corrupted h-tree. Since I don't have the filesystem image causing the crash, I'm not sure what was the cause but the stacktrace suggests we have corrupted one h-tree node while modifying another one so likely there was a cycle created in the h-tree. This series checks for it and bails out early. Honza ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree 2022-04-28 18:31 [PATCH 0/2] ext4: Fix crash when adding entry to corrupted directory Jan Kara @ 2022-04-28 18:31 ` Jan Kara 2022-05-17 23:55 ` Theodore Ts'o 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Kara @ 2022-04-28 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ted Tso; +Cc: linux-ext4, Jan Kara, stable A maliciously corrupted filesystem can contain cycles in the h-tree stored inside a directory. That can easily lead to the kernel corrupting tree nodes that were already verified under its hands while doing a node split and consequently accessing unallocated memory. Fix the problem by verifying traversed block numbers are unique. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- fs/ext4/namei.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c index ca6ee9940599..06441ad6104d 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c @@ -777,12 +777,14 @@ static struct dx_frame * dx_probe(struct ext4_filename *fname, struct inode *dir, struct dx_hash_info *hinfo, struct dx_frame *frame_in) { - unsigned count, indirect; + unsigned count, indirect, level, i; struct dx_entry *at, *entries, *p, *q, *m; struct dx_root *root; struct dx_frame *frame = frame_in; struct dx_frame *ret_err = ERR_PTR(ERR_BAD_DX_DIR); u32 hash; + ext4_lblk_t block; + ext4_lblk_t blocks[EXT4_HTREE_LEVEL]; memset(frame_in, 0, EXT4_HTREE_LEVEL * sizeof(frame_in[0])); frame->bh = ext4_read_dirblock(dir, 0, INDEX); @@ -854,6 +856,8 @@ dx_probe(struct ext4_filename *fname, struct inode *dir, } dxtrace(printk("Look up %x", hash)); + level = 0; + blocks[0] = 0; while (1) { count = dx_get_count(entries); if (!count || count > dx_get_limit(entries)) { @@ -882,15 +886,27 @@ dx_probe(struct ext4_filename *fname, struct inode *dir, dx_get_block(at))); frame->entries = entries; frame->at = at; - if (!indirect--) + + block = dx_get_block(at); + for (i = 0; i <= level; i++) { + if (blocks[i] == block) { + ext4_warning_inode(dir, + "dx entry: tree cycle block %u points back to block %u", + blocks[level], block); + goto fail; + } + } + blocks[++level] = block; + if (level > indirect) return frame; frame++; - frame->bh = ext4_read_dirblock(dir, dx_get_block(at), INDEX); + frame->bh = ext4_read_dirblock(dir, block, INDEX); if (IS_ERR(frame->bh)) { ret_err = (struct dx_frame *) frame->bh; frame->bh = NULL; goto fail; } + entries = ((struct dx_node *) frame->bh->b_data)->entries; if (dx_get_limit(entries) != dx_node_limit(dir)) { @@ -1278,7 +1294,7 @@ static int dx_make_map(struct inode *dir, struct buffer_head *bh, count++; cond_resched(); } - de = ext4_next_entry(de, blocksize); + de = ext4_next_entry(de, dir->i_sb->s_blocksize); } return count; } -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree 2022-04-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree Jan Kara @ 2022-05-17 23:55 ` Theodore Ts'o 2022-05-18 9:27 ` Jan Kara 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2022-05-17 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Kara; +Cc: linux-ext4, stable On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 08:31:38PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > A maliciously corrupted filesystem can contain cycles in the h-tree > stored inside a directory. That can easily lead to the kernel corrupting > tree nodes that were already verified under its hands while doing a node > split and consequently accessing unallocated memory. Fix the problem by > verifying traversed block numbers are unique. > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> When I tried applying this patch, I got this crash: ext4/052 23s ... [19:28:41][ 2.683407] run fstests ext4/052 at 2022-05-17 19:28:41 [ 5.433672] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: dx_probe+0x629/0x630 [ 5.434449] CPU: 0 PID: 2468 Comm: dirstress Not tainted 5.18.0-rc5-xfstests-00019-g204e6b4d4cc1 #610 [ 5.435012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 5.435501] Call Trace: [ 5.435659] <TASK> [ 5.435791] dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 [ 5.436027] panic+0x107/0x28f [ 5.436221] ? dx_probe+0x629/0x630 [ 5.436430] __stack_chk_fail+0x10/0x10 [ 5.436663] dx_probe+0x629/0x630 [ 5.436869] ext4_dx_add_entry+0x54/0x700 [ 5.437176] ext4_add_entry+0x38d/0x4e0 [ 5.437421] ext4_add_nondir+0x2b/0xc0 [ 5.437647] ext4_symlink+0x1c5/0x390 [ 5.437869] vfs_symlink+0x184/0x220 [ 5.438095] do_symlinkat+0x7a/0x110 [ 5.438313] __x64_sys_symlink+0x38/0x40 [ 5.438548] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 5.438762] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 5.439070] RIP: 0033:0x7f8137109a97 [ 5.439285] Code: f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d f6 d3 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 b8 58 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d c9 d3 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 5.440374] RSP: 002b:00007ffc514a2428 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000058 [ 5.440820] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000035d4a RCX: 00007f8137109a97 [ 5.441278] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffc514a2450 RDI: 00007ffc514a2450 [ 5.441734] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000013 [ 5.442153] R10: 00007ffc514a21c2 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000061a80 [ 5.442571] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc514a2450 R15: 00007ffc514a2c50 [ 5.442989] </TASK> [ 5.443289] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 5.443517] Rebooting in 5 seconds.. Applying just the first patch series (plus the patch hunk from this commit needed so that the first patch compiles) does not result in a crash, so the problem is clearly with this change. Looking more closely at ext4/052 which tests the large_dir feature, and then looking at the patch, I suspect the fix which is needed is: > + ext4_lblk_t blocks[EXT4_HTREE_LEVEL]; needs to be ext4_lblk_t blocks[EXT4_HTREE_LEVEL + 1]; Otherwise on large htree which is 3 levels deep, this > + blocks[++level] = block; is going to end up smashing the stack. Jan, do you agree? - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree 2022-05-17 23:55 ` Theodore Ts'o @ 2022-05-18 9:27 ` Jan Kara 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Kara @ 2022-05-18 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-ext4, stable On Tue 17-05-22 19:55:47, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 08:31:38PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > A maliciously corrupted filesystem can contain cycles in the h-tree > > stored inside a directory. That can easily lead to the kernel corrupting > > tree nodes that were already verified under its hands while doing a node > > split and consequently accessing unallocated memory. Fix the problem by > > verifying traversed block numbers are unique. > > > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> > > When I tried applying this patch, I got this crash: > > ext4/052 23s ... [19:28:41][ 2.683407] run fstests ext4/052 at 2022-05-17 19:28:41 > [ 5.433672] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: dx_probe+0x629/0x630 > [ 5.434449] CPU: 0 PID: 2468 Comm: dirstress Not tainted 5.18.0-rc5-xfstests-00019-g204e6b4d4cc1 #610 > [ 5.435012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 > [ 5.435501] Call Trace: > [ 5.435659] <TASK> > [ 5.435791] dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 > [ 5.436027] panic+0x107/0x28f > [ 5.436221] ? dx_probe+0x629/0x630 > [ 5.436430] __stack_chk_fail+0x10/0x10 > [ 5.436663] dx_probe+0x629/0x630 > [ 5.436869] ext4_dx_add_entry+0x54/0x700 > [ 5.437176] ext4_add_entry+0x38d/0x4e0 > [ 5.437421] ext4_add_nondir+0x2b/0xc0 > [ 5.437647] ext4_symlink+0x1c5/0x390 > [ 5.437869] vfs_symlink+0x184/0x220 > [ 5.438095] do_symlinkat+0x7a/0x110 > [ 5.438313] __x64_sys_symlink+0x38/0x40 > [ 5.438548] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 > [ 5.438762] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > [ 5.439070] RIP: 0033:0x7f8137109a97 > [ 5.439285] Code: f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d f6 d3 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 b8 58 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d c9 d3 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 > [ 5.440374] RSP: 002b:00007ffc514a2428 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000058 > [ 5.440820] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000035d4a RCX: 00007f8137109a97 > [ 5.441278] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffc514a2450 RDI: 00007ffc514a2450 > [ 5.441734] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000013 > [ 5.442153] R10: 00007ffc514a21c2 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000061a80 > [ 5.442571] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffc514a2450 R15: 00007ffc514a2c50 > [ 5.442989] </TASK> > [ 5.443289] Kernel Offset: disabled > [ 5.443517] Rebooting in 5 seconds.. > > Applying just the first patch series (plus the patch hunk from this > commit needed so that the first patch compiles) does not result in a > crash, so the problem is clearly with this change. I was wondering why my testing didn't catch this and the reason was that my test VM had a version of xfstests which had ext4/052 test but somehow the 'tests/ext4/group' file didn't contain that test (and a few other newer ones) so it didn't get executed. Not sure how that broken group file got there but anyway it's fixed now and indeed ext4/052 test crashes for me as well. > Looking more closely at ext4/052 which tests the large_dir feature, > and then looking at the patch, I suspect the fix which is needed > is: > > > + ext4_lblk_t blocks[EXT4_HTREE_LEVEL]; > > needs to be > > ext4_lblk_t blocks[EXT4_HTREE_LEVEL + 1]; > > Otherwise on large htree which is 3 levels deep, this > > > + blocks[++level] = block; > > is going to end up smashing the stack. > > Jan, do you agree? Yes, thanks for debugging this! But I'd prefer a fix like: if (++level > indirect) return frame; blocks[level] = block; because the store of the leaf block into 'blocks' array is just bogus. I'll send V2 with both the issues fixed. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-19 2:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-05-18 9:33 [PATCH 0/2 v2] ext4: Fix crash when adding entry to corrupted directory Jan Kara 2022-05-18 9:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Verify dir block before splitting it Jan Kara 2022-05-19 2:16 ` Theodore Ts'o 2022-05-18 9:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree Jan Kara -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2022-04-28 18:31 [PATCH 0/2] ext4: Fix crash when adding entry to corrupted directory Jan Kara 2022-04-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Avoid cycles in directory h-tree Jan Kara 2022-05-17 23:55 ` Theodore Ts'o 2022-05-18 9:27 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).