From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ext4: don't increase iversion counter for ea_inodes
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:52:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220816115248.2xj25pcays7dkrpp@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2e18765bc22ea851c2293c15a8aa4c3cec0fde5.camel@kernel.org>
On Fri 12-08-22 14:42:36, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 14:37 +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > ea_inodes are using i_version for storing part of the reference count so
> > we really need to leave it alone.
> >
> > The problem can be reproduced by xfstest ext4/026 when iversion is
> > enabled. Fix it by not calling inode_inc_iversion() for EXT4_EA_INODE_FL
> > inodes in ext4_mark_iloc_dirty().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > v2, v3: no change
> >
> > fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > index 601214453c3a..2a220be34caa 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > @@ -5731,7 +5731,12 @@ int ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(handle_t *handle,
> > }
> > ext4_fc_track_inode(handle, inode);
> >
> > - if (IS_I_VERSION(inode))
> > + /*
> > + * ea_inodes are using i_version for storing reference count, don't
> > + * mess with it
> > + */
> > + if (IS_I_VERSION(inode) &&
> > + !(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EA_INODE_FL))
> > inode_inc_iversion(inode);
> >
> > /* the do_update_inode consumes one bh->b_count */
>
>
> I've spent some time writing tests for the i_version counter (still
> quite rough right now), and what I've found is that this particular
> inode_inc_iversion results in the counter being bumped on _reads_ as
> well as writes, due to the atime changing. This call to
> inode_inc_iversion seems to make no sense, as we aren't bumping the
> mtime here.
>
> I'm still working on and testing this, but I think we'll probably just
> want to remove this inode_inc_iversion entirely, and leave the i_version
> bumping for normal files to happen when the timestamps are updated. So
> far, my testing seems to indicate that that does the right thing.
I agree that inode_inc_iversion() may be overly agressive here but where
else does get iversion updated for things like inode owner update or
permission changes?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-12 12:37 [PATCH v3 1/3] ext4: don't increase iversion counter for ea_inodes Lukas Czerner
2022-08-12 12:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE Lukas Czerner
2022-08-12 18:01 ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-12 18:12 ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-16 11:21 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-21 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-22 8:33 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-12 18:42 ` Eric Biggers
2022-08-16 11:41 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-12 12:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ext4: unconditionally enable the i_version counter Lukas Czerner
2022-08-12 13:05 ` Christian Brauner
2022-08-16 11:48 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-12 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ext4: don't increase iversion counter for ea_inodes Christian Brauner
2022-08-12 18:42 ` Jeff Layton
2022-08-16 11:52 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-08-16 12:18 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220816115248.2xj25pcays7dkrpp@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox