From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, rookxu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 4/8] ext4: Move overlap assert logic into a separate function
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:32:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220929113201.2fbwzw2c7vecnduc@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a762293342ceadc5c49870db0394a15ca53eebaa.1664269665.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue 27-09-22 14:46:44, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> Abstract out the logic to double check for overlaps in normalize_pa to
> a separate function. Since there has been no reports in past where we
> have seen any overlaps which hits this bug_on(), in future we can
> consider calling this function under "#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK" only.
>
> There are no functional changes in this patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
And I agree it might be interesting to move this code under appropriate
ifdef.
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 84950df709bb..d1ce34888dcc 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -3985,6 +3985,29 @@ static void ext4_mb_normalize_group_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> mb_debug(sb, "goal %u blocks for locality group\n", ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len);
> }
>
> +static inline void
> +ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> + ext4_lblk_t start, ext4_lblk_t end)
> +{
> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
> + struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
> + struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa;
> + ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
> + spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
> + if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
> + tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
> + tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
> +
> + BUG_ON(!(start >= tmp_pa_end || end <= tmp_pa_start));
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Normalization means making request better in terms of
> * size and alignment
> @@ -4141,18 +4164,7 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> size = end - start;
>
> /* XXX: extra loop to check we really don't overlap preallocations */
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
> - spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
> - if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
> - tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
> - tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
> -
> - BUG_ON(!(start >= tmp_pa_end || end <= tmp_pa_start));
> - }
> - spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
> - }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(ac, start, end);
>
> /*
> * In this function "start" and "size" are normalized for better
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-27 9:16 [RFC v2 0/8] ext4: Convert inode preallocation list to an rbtree Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-27 9:16 ` [RFC v3 1/8] ext4: Stop searching if PA doesn't satisfy non-extent file Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-29 11:24 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-27 9:16 ` [RFC v3 2/8] ext4: Refactor code related to freeing PAs Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-29 11:26 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-27 9:16 ` [RFC v3 3/8] ext4: Refactor code in ext4_mb_normalize_request() and ext4_mb_use_preallocated() Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-29 11:30 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-27 9:16 ` [RFC v3 4/8] ext4: Move overlap assert logic into a separate function Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-29 11:32 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-09-27 9:16 ` [RFC v3 5/8] ext4: Abstract out overlap fix/check logic in ext4_mb_normalize_request() Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-29 11:36 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-27 9:16 ` [RFC v3 6/8] ext4: Convert pa->pa_inode_list and pa->pa_obj_lock into a union Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-29 11:40 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-27 9:16 ` [RFC v3 7/8] ext4: Use rbtrees to manage PAs instead of inode i_prealloc_list Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-29 12:39 ` Jan Kara
2022-10-03 11:25 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-27 9:16 ` [RFC v3 8/8] ext4: Remove the logic to trim inode PAs Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-09-29 12:53 ` Jan Kara
2022-10-06 6:55 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2022-10-06 8:59 ` Jan Kara
2022-10-06 10:03 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220929113201.2fbwzw2c7vecnduc@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).