Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ext4: Drop pointless IO submission from ext4_bio_write_page()
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:36:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221201070655.cugep2fdrtntp67y@riteshh-domain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221130163608.29034-4-jack@suse.cz>

On 22/11/30 05:35PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> We submit outstanding IO in ext4_bio_write_page() if we find a buffer we
> are not going to write. This is however pointless because we already
> handle submission of previous IO in case we detect newly added buffer
> head is discontiguous. So just delete the pointless IO submission call.

Agreed. io_submit_add_bh() is anyway called at the end for submitting buffers.
And io_submit_add_bh() also has the logic to:
1. submit a discontiguous bio
2. Also submit a bio if the bio gets full (submit_and_retry label).

Hence calling ext4_io_submit() early is not required.

I guess the same will also hold true for at this place.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc7/source/fs/ext4/page-io.c#L524


But this patch looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>



>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/page-io.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> index 2bdfb8a046d9..beaec6d81074 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> @@ -489,8 +489,6 @@ int ext4_bio_write_page(struct ext4_io_submit *io,
>  					redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
>  				keep_towrite = true;
>  			}
> -			if (io->io_bio)
> -				ext4_io_submit(io);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		if (buffer_new(bh))
> --
> 2.35.3
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-01  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-30 16:35 [PATCH 0/9] ext4: Stop using ext4_writepage() for writeout of ordered data Jan Kara
2022-11-30 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/9] ext4: Handle redirtying in ext4_bio_write_page() Jan Kara
2022-12-01  8:57   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-11-30 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Move keep_towrite handling to ext4_bio_write_page() Jan Kara
2022-12-01  9:13   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-11-30 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/9] ext4: Remove nr_submitted from ext4_bio_write_page() Jan Kara
2022-12-01  9:14   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-11-30 16:35 ` [PATCH 4/9] ext4: Drop pointless IO submission " Jan Kara
2022-12-01  7:06   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM) [this message]
2022-12-01 10:35     ` Jan Kara
2022-12-01 13:40       ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-11-30 16:35 ` [PATCH 5/9] ext4: Add support for writepages calls that cannot map blocks Jan Kara
2022-12-01 11:13   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-12-01 11:50     ` Jan Kara
2022-12-01 13:28       ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-11-30 16:35 ` [PATCH 6/9] ext4: Provide ext4_do_writepages() Jan Kara
2022-12-01 11:15   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-11-30 16:35 ` [PATCH 7/9] ext4: Move percpu_rwsem protection into ext4_writepages() Jan Kara
2022-12-01 11:16   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-11-30 16:35 ` [PATCH 8/9] ext4: Switch to using ext4_do_writepages() for ordered data writeout Jan Kara
2022-12-01 11:17   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-11-30 16:36 ` [PATCH 9/9] ext4: Remove ordered data support from ext4_writepage() Jan Kara
2022-12-01 11:21   ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-12-01 13:36     ` Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-12-01 14:11       ` Jan Kara
2022-12-01 14:25         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-01 11:42 ` [PATCH 0/9] ext4: Stop using ext4_writepage() for writeout of ordered data Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2022-12-01 11:55   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221201070655.cugep2fdrtntp67y@riteshh-domain \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox