From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ye Bin <yebin@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz, Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ext4: rename xattr_find_entry() and __xattr_check_inode()
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:58:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221207105857.75xesk7psydjibz4@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221207074043.1286731-6-yebin@huaweicloud.com>
On Wed 07-12-22 15:40:42, Ye Bin wrote:
> From: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
>
> xattr_find_entry() and __xattr_check_inode() is in EXT4 xattr module. so
> add 'ext4' prefix to unify name style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/xattr.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> index efa623658c12..5c0476ff62c8 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> @@ -290,8 +290,9 @@ __ext4_xattr_check_block(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *bh,
>
>
> static int
> -__xattr_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_xattr_ibody_header *header,
> - void *end, const char *function, unsigned int line)
> +__ext4_xattr_check_inode(struct inode *inode,
> + struct ext4_xattr_ibody_header *header, void *end,
> + const char *function, unsigned int line)
> {
> int error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>
> @@ -307,12 +308,12 @@ __xattr_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_xattr_ibody_header *header,
> return error;
> }
>
> -#define xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end) \
> - __xattr_check_inode((inode), (header), (end), __func__, __LINE__)
> +#define ext4_xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end) \
> + __ext4_xattr_check_inode((inode), (header), (end), __func__, __LINE__)
>
> static int
> -xattr_find_entry(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_xattr_entry **pentry,
> - void *end, int name_index, const char *name, int sorted)
> +ext4_xattr_find_entry(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_xattr_entry **pentry,
> + void *end, int name_index, const char *name, int sorted)
> {
> struct ext4_xattr_entry *entry, *next;
> size_t name_len;
> @@ -577,7 +578,7 @@ ext4_xattr_block_get(struct inode *inode, int name_index, const char *name,
> ext4_xattr_block_cache_insert(ea_block_cache, bh);
> entry = BFIRST(bh);
> end = bh->b_data + bh->b_size;
> - error = xattr_find_entry(inode, &entry, end, name_index, name, 1);
> + error = ext4_xattr_find_entry(inode, &entry, end, name_index, name, 1);
> if (error)
> goto cleanup;
> size = le32_to_cpu(entry->e_value_size);
> @@ -628,11 +629,11 @@ ext4_xattr_ibody_get(struct inode *inode, int name_index, const char *name,
> raw_inode = ext4_raw_inode(&iloc);
> header = IHDR(inode, raw_inode);
> end = (void *)raw_inode + EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_inode_size;
> - error = xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end);
> + error = ext4_xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end);
> if (error)
> goto cleanup;
> entry = IFIRST(header);
> - error = xattr_find_entry(inode, &entry, end, name_index, name, 0);
> + error = ext4_xattr_find_entry(inode, &entry, end, name_index, name, 0);
> if (error)
> goto cleanup;
> size = le32_to_cpu(entry->e_value_size);
> @@ -773,7 +774,7 @@ ext4_xattr_ibody_list(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size)
> raw_inode = ext4_raw_inode(&iloc);
> header = IHDR(inode, raw_inode);
> end = (void *)raw_inode + EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_inode_size;
> - error = xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end);
> + error = ext4_xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end);
> if (error)
> goto cleanup;
> error = ext4_xattr_list_entries(dentry, IFIRST(header),
> @@ -859,7 +860,7 @@ int ext4_get_inode_usage(struct inode *inode, qsize_t *usage)
> raw_inode = ext4_raw_inode(&iloc);
> header = IHDR(inode, raw_inode);
> end = (void *)raw_inode + EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_inode_size;
> - ret = xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end);
> + ret = ext4_xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> @@ -1862,8 +1863,8 @@ ext4_xattr_block_find(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
> bs->s.first = BFIRST(bs->bh);
> bs->s.end = bs->bh->b_data + bs->bh->b_size;
> bs->s.here = bs->s.first;
> - error = xattr_find_entry(inode, &bs->s.here, bs->s.end,
> - i->name_index, i->name, 1);
> + error = ext4_xattr_find_entry(inode, &bs->s.here, bs->s.end,
> + i->name_index, i->name, 1);
> if (error && error != -ENODATA)
> return error;
> bs->s.not_found = error;
> @@ -2222,12 +2223,12 @@ int ext4_xattr_ibody_find(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
> is->s.here = is->s.first;
> is->s.end = (void *)raw_inode + EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_inode_size;
> if (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_XATTR)) {
> - error = xattr_check_inode(inode, header, is->s.end);
> + error = ext4_xattr_check_inode(inode, header, is->s.end);
> if (error)
> return error;
> /* Find the named attribute. */
> - error = xattr_find_entry(inode, &is->s.here, is->s.end,
> - i->name_index, i->name, 0);
> + error = ext4_xattr_find_entry(inode, &is->s.here, is->s.end,
> + i->name_index, i->name, 0);
> if (error && error != -ENODATA)
> return error;
> is->s.not_found = error;
> @@ -2742,7 +2743,7 @@ int ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(struct inode *inode, int new_extra_isize,
> min_offs = end - base;
> total_ino = sizeof(struct ext4_xattr_ibody_header) + sizeof(u32);
>
> - error = xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end);
> + error = ext4_xattr_check_inode(inode, header, end);
> if (error)
> goto cleanup;
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-07 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 7:40 [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix two issue about ext4 extended attribute Ye Bin
2022-12-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea Ye Bin
2022-12-07 7:51 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ext4: add primary check extended attribute inode in ext4_xattr_check_entries() Ye Bin
2022-12-07 7:37 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-07 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2022-12-07 11:39 ` yebin (H)
2022-12-07 12:03 ` Jan Kara
2022-12-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ext4: remove unnessary size check in ext4_xattr_inode_get() Ye Bin
2022-12-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ext4: allocate extended attribute value in vmalloc area Ye Bin
2022-12-07 10:58 ` Jan Kara
2022-12-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ext4: rename xattr_find_entry() and __xattr_check_inode() Ye Bin
2022-12-07 7:35 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-07 7:41 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-07 10:58 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-12-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ext4: fix inode leak in 'ext4_xattr_inode_create()' Ye Bin
2022-12-07 7:44 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-07 11:00 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221207105857.75xesk7psydjibz4@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
--cc=yebin@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox