Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ext4: Replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page()
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 17:39:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230102163908.gxe3afwgbfejbq4m@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221231174439.8557-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>

On Sat 31-12-22 18:44:39, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> kmap_atomic() is deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page(). Therefore,
> replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page().
> 
> kmap_atomic() is implemented like a kmap_local_page() which also disables
> page-faults and preemption (the latter only for !PREEMPT_RT kernels).
> 
> However, the code within the mappings and un-mappings in ext4/inline.c
> does not depend on the above-mentioned side effects.
> 
> Therefore, a mere replacement of the old API with the new one is all it
> is required (i.e., there is no need to explicitly add any calls to
> pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable()).
> 
> Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>

The patch looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
> 
> I tried my best to understand the code within mapping and un-mapping.
> However, I'm not an expert. Therefore, although I'm pretty confident, I
> cannot be 100% sure that the code between the mapping and the un-mapping
> does not depend on pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable().
> 
> Unfortunately, I cannot currently test this changes to check the
> above-mentioned assumptions. However, if I'm required to do the tests
> with (x)fstests, I have no problems with doing them in the next days.
> 
> If so, I'll test in a QEMU/KVM x86_32 VM, 6GB RAM, booting a kernel with
> HIGHMEM64GB enabled.
> 
> I'd like to hear whether or not the maintainers require these tests
> and/or other tests.
> 
>  fs/ext4/inline.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> index 2b42ececa46d..bfb044425d8a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> @@ -490,10 +490,10 @@ static int ext4_read_inline_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	len = min_t(size_t, ext4_get_inline_size(inode), i_size_read(inode));
> -	kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> +	kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
>  	ret = ext4_read_inline_data(inode, kaddr, len, &iloc);
>  	flush_dcache_page(page);
> -	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> +	kunmap_local(kaddr);
>  	zero_user_segment(page, len, PAGE_SIZE);
>  	SetPageUptodate(page);
>  	brelse(iloc.bh);
> @@ -763,9 +763,9 @@ int ext4_write_inline_data_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
>  		 */
>  		(void) ext4_find_inline_data_nolock(inode);
>  
> -		kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> +		kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
>  		ext4_write_inline_data(inode, &iloc, kaddr, pos, copied);
> -		kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> +		kunmap_local(kaddr);
>  		SetPageUptodate(page);
>  		/* clear page dirty so that writepages wouldn't work for us. */
>  		ClearPageDirty(page);
> @@ -831,9 +831,9 @@ ext4_journalled_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode,
>  	}
>  
>  	ext4_write_lock_xattr(inode, &no_expand);
> -	kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> +	kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
>  	ext4_write_inline_data(inode, &iloc, kaddr, 0, len);
> -	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> +	kunmap_local(kaddr);
>  	ext4_write_unlock_xattr(inode, &no_expand);
>  
>  	return iloc.bh;
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-02 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-31 17:44 [PATCH] fs/ext4: Replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page() Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-01-02 16:39 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-01-03  4:30 ` Ira Weiny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230102163908.gxe3afwgbfejbq4m@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox