From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/11] ext4: Convert mballoc cr (criteria) to enum
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:11:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230309121122.vzfswandgqqm4yk5@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9670431b31aa62e83509fa2802aad364910ee52e.1674822311.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri 27-01-23 18:07:31, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> Convert criteria to be an enum so it easier to maintain. This change
> also makes it easier to insert new criterias in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Just two small comments below:
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index b8b00457da8d..6037b8e0af86 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -126,6 +126,14 @@ enum SHIFT_DIRECTION {
> SHIFT_RIGHT,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Number of criterias defined. For each criteria, mballoc has slightly
> + * different way of finding the required blocks nad usually, higher the
^^^ and
> + * criteria the slower the allocation. We start at lower criterias and keep
> + * falling back to higher ones if we are not able to find any blocks.
> + */
> +#define EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS 4
> +
So defining this in a different header than the enum itself is fragile. I
understand you need it in ext4_sb_info declaration so probably I'd move the
enum declaration to ext4.h. Alternatively I suppose we could move a lot of
mballoc stuff out of ext4_sb_info into a separate struct because there's a
lot of it. But that would be much larger undertaking.
Also when going for symbolic allocator scan names maybe we could actually
make names sensible instead of CR[0-4]? Perhaps like CR_ORDER2_ALIGNED,
CR_BEST_LENGHT_FAST, CR_BEST_LENGTH_ALL, CR_ANY_FREE. And probably we could
deal with ordered comparisons like in:
if (cr < 2 &&
(!sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex ||
((group & ((1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) - 1)) != 0)) &
!(ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) &&
(gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))))
return 0;
to declare CR_FAST_SCAN = 2, or something like that. What do you think?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 12:37 [RFC 00/11] multiblock allocator improvements Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 01/11] ext4: mballoc: Remove useless setting of ac_criteria Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:36 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 02/11] ext4: Remove unused extern variables declaration Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:37 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 03/11] ext4: mballoc: Fix getting the right group desc in ext4_mb_prefetch_fini Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 11:42 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 04/11] ext4: Convert mballoc cr (criteria) to enum Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:11 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-03-17 10:26 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 10:55 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:42 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-04-20 6:32 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-04-20 14:58 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 05/11] ext4: Add per CR extent scanned counter Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:14 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 06/11] ext4: Add counter to track successful allocation of goal length Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:17 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 07/11] ext4: Avoid scanning smaller extents in BG during CR1 Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 12:20 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 08/11] ext4: Don't skip prefetching BLOCK_UNINIT groups Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:14 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-17 10:55 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 10:57 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:43 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-26 3:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 09/11] ext4: Ensure ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() is called for all prefetched BGs Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:23 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 10/11] ext4: Abstract out logic to search average fragment list Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 14:25 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-27 12:37 ` [RFC 11/11] ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5) Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-09 15:06 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-17 11:37 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-03-23 11:05 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-25 14:46 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230309121122.vzfswandgqqm4yk5@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox