public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
	<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	<yukuai3@huawei.com>, <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/8] ext4: make __es_remove_extent return void
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:41:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230412124126.2286716-5-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412124126.2286716-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>

Now __es_remove_extent() cannot fail (it will always remove what it should,
maybe more) so just make it return void.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
V2->V3:
	New added.

 fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index a7c3200f9cbe..5207d3a9c1ad 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ static struct kmem_cache *ext4_es_cachep;
 static struct kmem_cache *ext4_pending_cachep;
 
 static int __es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, struct extent_status *newes);
-static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
-			      ext4_lblk_t end, int *reserved);
+static void __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
+			       ext4_lblk_t end, int *reserved);
 static int es_reclaim_extents(struct ext4_inode_info *ei, int *nr_to_scan);
 static int __es_shrink(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, int nr_to_scan,
 		       struct ext4_inode_info *locked_ei);
@@ -862,9 +862,7 @@ int ext4_es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
 	ext4_es_insert_extent_check(inode, &newes);
 
 	write_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock);
-	err = __es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, end, NULL);
-	if (err != 0)
-		goto error;
+	__es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, end, NULL);
 retry:
 	err = __es_insert_extent(inode, &newes);
 	if (err == -ENOMEM && __es_shrink(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb),
@@ -878,7 +876,6 @@ int ext4_es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
 	     status & EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN))
 		__revise_pending(inode, lblk, len);
 
-error:
 	write_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock);
 
 	ext4_es_print_tree(inode);
@@ -1311,11 +1308,10 @@ static unsigned int get_rsvd(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t end,
  *
  * If @reserved is not NULL and delayed allocation is enabled, counts
  * block/cluster reservations freed by removing range and if bigalloc
- * enabled cancels pending reservations as needed. Returns 0 on success,
- * error code on failure.
+ * enabled cancels pending reservations as needed.
  */
-static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
-			      ext4_lblk_t end, int *reserved)
+static void __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
+			       ext4_lblk_t end, int *reserved)
 {
 	struct ext4_es_tree *tree = &EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_tree;
 	struct rb_node *node;
@@ -1334,9 +1330,9 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
 
 	es = __es_tree_search(&tree->root, lblk);
 	if (!es)
-		goto out;
+		return;
 	if (es->es_lblk > end)
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
 	/* Simply invalidate cache_es. */
 	tree->cache_es = NULL;
@@ -1370,7 +1366,7 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
 				    __es_shrink(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb),
 							128, EXT4_I(inode)))
 					goto retry;
-				goto out;
+				return;
 			}
 		} else {
 			es->es_lblk = end + 1;
@@ -1429,8 +1425,6 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
 out_get_reserved:
 	if (count_reserved)
 		*reserved = get_rsvd(inode, end, es, &rc);
-out:
-	return err;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1469,7 +1463,7 @@ int ext4_es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
 	 * is reclaimed.
 	 */
 	write_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock);
-	err = __es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, end, &reserved);
+	__es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, end, &reserved);
 	write_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock);
 	ext4_es_print_tree(inode);
 	ext4_da_release_space(inode, reserved);
@@ -2012,9 +2006,7 @@ int ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
 
 	write_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock);
 
-	err = __es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, lblk, NULL);
-	if (err != 0)
-		goto error;
+	__es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, lblk, NULL);
 retry:
 	err = __es_insert_extent(inode, &newes);
 	if (err == -ENOMEM && __es_shrink(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb),
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12 12:41 [PATCH v3 0/8] ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_da_update_reserve_space Baokun Li
2023-04-12 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ext4: only update i_reserved_data_blocks on successful block allocation Baokun Li
2023-04-12 18:45   ` Jan Kara
2023-04-12 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ext4: add a new helper to check if es must be kept Baokun Li
2023-04-12 18:53   ` Jan Kara
2023-04-13  2:00     ` Baokun Li
2023-04-13 10:34       ` Jan Kara
2023-04-13 12:26         ` Baokun Li
2023-04-12 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL if allocating extents_status cannot fail Baokun Li
2023-04-13 10:30   ` Jan Kara
2023-04-24  3:45     ` Baokun Li
2023-04-12 12:41 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2023-04-12 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ext4: make ext4_es_remove_extent return void Baokun Li
2023-04-12 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ext4: make ext4_es_insert_delayed_block " Baokun Li
2023-04-12 14:19   ` kernel test robot
2023-04-13  2:36     ` Baokun Li
2023-04-12 17:24   ` kernel test robot
2023-04-12 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ext4: make ext4_es_insert_extent " Baokun Li
2023-04-12 12:41 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ext4: make ext4_zeroout_es " Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230412124126.2286716-5-libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox