public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [jlayton:ctime] [ext4]  ff9aaf58e8: ltp.statx06.fail
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 10:39:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230502003929.GG2155823@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0dc1a9d7f2b99d2bfdcabb7adc51d7c0b0c81457.camel@kernel.org>

On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 12:05:17PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 22:09 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> The test does this:
> 
>         SAFE_CLOCK_GETTIME(CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE, &before_time);
>         clock_wait_tick();
>         tc->operation();
>         clock_wait_tick();
>         SAFE_CLOCK_GETTIME(CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE, &after_time);
> 
> ...and with that, I usually end up with before/after_times that are 1ns
> apart, since my machine is reporting a 1ns granularity.
> 
> The first problem is that the coarse grained timestamps represent the
> lower bound of what time could end up in the inode. With multigrain
> ctimes, we can end up grabbing a fine-grained timestamp to store in the
> inode that will be later than either coarse grained time that was
> fetched.
> 
> That's easy enough to fix -- grab a coarse time for "before" and a fine-
> grained time for "after".
> 
> The clock_getres function though returns that it has a 1ns granularity
> (since it does). With multigrain ctimes, we no longer have that at the
> filesystem level. It's a 2ns granularity now (as we need the lowest bit
> for the flag).

Why are you even using the low bit for this? Nanosecond resolution
only uses 30 bits, leaving the upper two bits of a 32 bit tv_nsec
field available for internal status bits. As long as we mask out the
internal bits when reading the VFS timestamp tv_nsec field, then
we don't need to change the timestamp resolution, right?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-02  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-01 14:09 [jlayton:ctime] [ext4] ff9aaf58e8: ltp.statx06.fail kernel test robot
2023-05-01 16:05 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-02  0:39   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-05-02 10:12     ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230502003929.GG2155823@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox