linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix possible corruption when moving a directory
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 12:46:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230523104644.dgvmjq4xzhemlpbm@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230517045836.GA11594@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Tue 16-05-23 21:58:36, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:22:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > When we are renaming a directory to a different directory, we need to
> > update '..' entry in the moved directory. However nothing prevents moved
> > directory from being modified and even converted from the inline format
> > to the normal format. When such race happens the rename code gets
> > confused and we crash. Fix the problem by locking the moved directory.
> 
> Four months later, I have a question --
> 
> Is it necessary for ext4_cross_rename to inode_lock_nested on both
> old.inode and new.inode?  We're resetting the dotdot entries on both
> children in that case, which means that we also need to lock out inline
> data conversions, right?

Ouch, you're right. In that path we need to lock both source & target
directories since lock_two_nondirectories() call in vfs_rename() will not
lock them... I'll send a patch. Thanks for spotting this!

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

      reply	other threads:[~2023-05-23 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-26 11:22 [PATCH] ext4: Fix possible corruption when moving a directory Jan Kara
2023-02-19  5:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-05-17  4:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-23 10:46   ` Jan Kara [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230523104644.dgvmjq4xzhemlpbm@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).