From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43705EB64DC for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 06:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231681AbjF2GjX (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2023 02:39:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42070 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231208AbjF2GjR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2023 02:39:17 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B94D62705; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 23:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.143]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Qs81W0fBXz4f4YHM; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:39:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgDnUy4LJ51kJfVfMA--.3175S6; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:39:11 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Subject: [PATCH v5 4/8] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 22:40:03 +0800 Message-Id: <20230629144007.1263510-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20230629144007.1263510-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230629144007.1263510-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgDnUy4LJ51kJfVfMA--.3175S6 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW3XF45Xw17tF48ArWfJr17trb_yoW7XFyUpF nIyF1DCr1fWr1DuFWIk34qqF1rKw48Gw1rJ34xGr1fCF12krs8Aay8ta40vasrKFW7A3Z0 vr1Yya4UCr47WrDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUmq14x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2jI8I6cxK62vIxIIY0VWUZVW8XwA2048vs2IY02 0E87I2jVAFwI0_JF0E3s1l82xGYIkIc2x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0 rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6x IIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xv wVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFc xC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUGVWUXwAv7VCY1x0262k0Y48FwI0_ Jr0_Gr1lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x 0EwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC 6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWw C2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_ JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJV WUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIY CTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjTRtR6wUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used to: 1. remove repeat code to normally update bitmap and group descriptor on disk. 2. call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb instead of only setting bits in block bitmap to fix the bitmap. Function ext4_mb_mark_group_bb will also update checksum of bitmap and other counter along with the bit change to keep the cosistent with bit change or block bitmap will be marked corrupted as checksum of bitmap is in inconsistent state. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 89 ++++++++++++----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index b1d8e140a3fa..34fd12aeaf8d 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -4064,13 +4064,17 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, handle_t *handle, unsigned int reserv_clstrs) { - struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL; + struct ext4_mark_context mc = { + .handle = handle, + .sb = ac->ac_sb, + .state = 1, + }; struct ext4_group_desc *gdp; - struct buffer_head *gdp_bh; struct ext4_sb_info *sbi; struct super_block *sb; ext4_fsblk_t block; int err, len; + int flags = 0; BUG_ON(ac->ac_status != AC_STATUS_FOUND); BUG_ON(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0); @@ -4078,32 +4082,13 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, sb = ac->ac_sb; sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); - bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group); - if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) { - return PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh); - } - - BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh, "getting write access"); - err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sb, bitmap_bh, - EXT4_JTR_NONE); - if (err) - goto out_err; - - err = -EIO; - gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, &gdp_bh); + gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, NULL); if (!gdp) - goto out_err; - + return -EIO; ext4_debug("using block group %u(%d)\n", ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp)); - BUFFER_TRACE(gdp_bh, "get_write_access"); - err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sb, gdp_bh, EXT4_JTR_NONE); - if (err) - goto out_err; - block = ext4_grp_offs_to_block(sb, &ac->ac_b_ex); - len = EXT4_C2B(sbi, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len); if (!ext4_inode_block_valid(ac->ac_inode, block, len)) { ext4_error(sb, "Allocating blocks %llu-%llu which overlap " @@ -4112,41 +4097,28 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, * Fix the bitmap and return EFSCORRUPTED * We leak some of the blocks here. */ - ext4_lock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group); - mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start, - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len); - ext4_unlock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group); - err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh); + err = ext4_mb_mark_group_bb(&mc, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, + ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start, + ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len, + 0); if (!err) err = -EFSCORRUPTED; - goto out_err; + return err; } - ext4_lock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group); #ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK - { - int i; - for (i = 0; i < ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len; i++) { - BUG_ON(mb_test_bit(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start + i, - bitmap_bh->b_data)); - } - } + flags |= EXT4_MB_BITMAP_MARKED_CHECK; #endif - mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start, - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len); - if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) && - (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) { - gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT); - ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, - ext4_free_clusters_after_init(sb, - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, gdp)); - } - len = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len; - ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, len); - ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, gdp, bitmap_bh); - ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, gdp); + err = ext4_mb_mark_group_bb(&mc, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, + ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len, + flags); + + if (err && mc.changed == 0) + return err; - ext4_unlock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group); +#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK + BUG_ON(mc.changed != ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len); +#endif percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len); /* * Now reduce the dirty block count also. Should not go negative @@ -4156,21 +4128,6 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter, reserv_clstrs); - if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) { - ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group); - atomic64_sub(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len, - &sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi, s_flex_groups, - flex_group)->free_clusters); - } - - err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh); - if (err) - goto out_err; - err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, gdp_bh); - -out_err: - brelse(bitmap_bh); return err; } -- 2.30.0