linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] ext4: avoid potential data overflow in next_linear_group
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 02:50:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230725185106.2147273-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725185106.2147273-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

ngroups is ext4_group_t (unsigned int) while next_linear_group treat it
in int. If ngroups is bigger than max number described by int, it will
be treat as a negative number. Then "return group + 1 >= ngroups ? 0 :
group + 1;" may keep returning 0.
Switch int to ext4_group_t in next_linear_group to fix the overflow.

Fixes: 196e402adf2e ("ext4: improve cr 0 / cr 1 group scanning")
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 62e7a045ad79..3cd795e98008 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -1080,8 +1080,9 @@ static inline int should_optimize_scan(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
  * Return next linear group for allocation. If linear traversal should not be
  * performed, this function just returns the same group
  */
-static int
-next_linear_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, int group, int ngroups)
+static ext4_group_t
+next_linear_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, ext4_group_t group,
+		  ext4_group_t ngroups)
 {
 	if (!should_optimize_scan(ac))
 		goto inc_and_return;
-- 
2.30.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-25 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-25 18:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] A few fixes and cleanups to mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] ext4: correct grp validation in ext4_mb_good_group Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 11:06   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-25 18:50 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2023-07-25 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] ext4: return found group directly in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] ext4: use is_power_of_2 helper in ext4_mb_regular_allocator Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] ext4: remove unnecessary return for void function Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] ext4: replace the traditional ternary conditional operator with with max()/min() Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] ext4: remove unused ext4_{set}/{clear}_bit_atomic Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] ext4: return found group directly in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] ext4: return found group directly in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail Kemeng Shi
2023-07-25 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] ext4: correct some stale comment of criteria Kemeng Shi
2023-07-26 14:50   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-07-27  1:29     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-27  5:36       ` Ojaswin Mujoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230725185106.2147273-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).