From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/16] ext4: correct the start block of counting reserved clusters
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 17:26:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230824092619.1327976-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824092619.1327976-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
When big allocate feature is enabled, we need to count and update
reserved clusters before removing a delayed only extent_status entry.
{init|count|get}_rsvd() have already done this, but the start block
number of this counting isn's correct in the following case.
lblk end
| |
v v
-------------------------
| | orig_es
-------------------------
^ ^
len1 is 0 | len2 |
If the start block of the orig_es entry founded is bigger than lblk, we
passed lblk as start block to count_rsvd(), but the length is correct,
finally, the range to be counted is offset. This patch fix this by
passing the start blocks to 'orig_es->lblk + len1'.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 6f7de14c0fa8..5e625ea4545d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -1405,8 +1405,8 @@ static int __es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
}
}
if (count_reserved)
- count_rsvd(inode, lblk, orig_es.es_len - len1 - len2,
- &orig_es, &rc);
+ count_rsvd(inode, orig_es.es_lblk + len1,
+ orig_es.es_len - len1 - len2, &orig_es, &rc);
goto out_get_reserved;
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-24 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 9:26 [RFC PATCH 00/16] ext4: more accurate metadata reservaion for delalloc mount option Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2023-08-30 13:10 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] ext4: correct the start block of counting reserved clusters Jan Kara
2023-10-06 2:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail Zhang Yi
2023-08-30 13:25 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-06 2:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] ext4: let __revise_pending() return the number of new inserts pendings Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] ext4: count removed reserved blocks for delalloc only es entry Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] ext4: pass real delayed status into ext4_es_insert_extent() Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] ext4: move delalloc data reserve spcae updating " Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] ext4: count inode's total delalloc data blocks into ext4_es_tree Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] ext4: refactor delalloc space reservation Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] ext4: count reserved metadata blocks for delalloc per inode Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] ext4: reserve meta blocks in ext4_da_reserve_space() Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] ext4: factor out common part of ext4_da_{release|update_reserve}_space() Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] ext4: update reserved meta blocks in ext4_da_{release|update_reserve}_space() Zhang Yi
2023-09-06 7:35 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] ext4: calculate the worst extent blocks needed of a delalloc es entry Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] ext4: reserve extent blocks for delalloc Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] ext4: flush delalloc blocks if no free space Zhang Yi
2023-08-24 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] ext4: drop ext4_nonda_switch() Zhang Yi
2023-08-30 15:30 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] ext4: more accurate metadata reservaion for delalloc mount option Jan Kara
2023-09-01 2:33 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230824092619.1327976-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).