From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/11] ext4: add first unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple in mballoc
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 23:50:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230826155028.4019470-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230826155028.4019470-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Here are prepared work:
1. Include mballoc-test.c to mballoc.c to be able test static function
in mballoc.c.
2. Implement static stub to avoid read IO to disk.
3. Construct fake super_block. Only partial members are set, more members
will be set when more functions are tested.
Then unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple is added.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 322 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 +
2 files changed, 326 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d643c56ac003
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test of ext4 multiblocks allocation.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/static_stub.h>
+
+#include "ext4.h"
+
+struct mbt_grp_ctx {
+ struct buffer_head bitmap_bh;
+ /* desc and gd_bh are just the place holders for now */
+ struct ext4_group_desc desc;
+ struct buffer_head gd_bh;
+};
+
+struct mbt_ctx {
+ struct mbt_grp_ctx *grp_ctx;
+};
+
+struct mbt_ext4_super_block {
+ struct super_block sb;
+ struct mbt_ctx mbt_ctx;
+};
+
+#define MBT_CTX(_sb) (&(container_of((_sb), struct mbt_ext4_super_block, sb)->mbt_ctx))
+#define MBT_GRP_CTX(_sb, _group) (&MBT_CTX(_sb)->grp_ctx[_group])
+
+static struct super_block *mbt_ext4_alloc_super_block(void)
+{
+ struct ext4_super_block *es = kzalloc(sizeof(*es), GFP_KERNEL);
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(*sbi), GFP_KERNEL);
+ struct mbt_ext4_super_block *fsb = kzalloc(sizeof(*fsb), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (fsb == NULL || sbi == NULL || es == NULL)
+ goto out;
+
+ sbi->s_es = es;
+ fsb->sb.s_fs_info = sbi;
+ return &fsb->sb;
+
+out:
+ kfree(fsb);
+ kfree(sbi);
+ kfree(es);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void mbt_ext4_free_super_block(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ struct mbt_ext4_super_block *fsb = container_of(sb, struct mbt_ext4_super_block, sb);
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+
+ kfree(sbi->s_es);
+ kfree(sbi);
+ kfree(fsb);
+}
+
+struct mbt_ext4_block_layout {
+ unsigned char blocksize_bits;
+ unsigned int cluster_bits;
+ uint32_t blocks_per_group;
+ ext4_group_t group_count;
+ uint16_t desc_size;
+};
+
+static void mbt_init_sb_layout(struct super_block *sb,
+ struct mbt_ext4_block_layout *layout)
+{
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+ struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es;
+
+ sb->s_blocksize = 1UL << layout->blocksize_bits;
+ sb->s_blocksize_bits = layout->blocksize_bits;
+
+ sbi->s_groups_count = layout->group_count;
+ sbi->s_blocks_per_group = layout->blocks_per_group;
+ sbi->s_cluster_bits = layout->cluster_bits;
+ sbi->s_cluster_ratio = 1U << layout->cluster_bits;
+ sbi->s_clusters_per_group = layout->blocks_per_group >>
+ layout->cluster_bits;
+ sbi->s_desc_size = layout->desc_size;
+
+ es->s_first_data_block = cpu_to_le32(0);
+ es->s_blocks_count_lo = cpu_to_le32(layout->blocks_per_group *
+ layout->group_count);
+}
+
+static int mbt_grp_ctx_init(struct super_block *sb,
+ struct mbt_grp_ctx *grp_ctx)
+{
+ grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data = kzalloc(EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE(sb), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void mbt_grp_ctx_release(struct mbt_grp_ctx *grp_ctx)
+{
+ kfree(grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data);
+ grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data = NULL;
+}
+
+static void mbt_ctx_mark_used(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
+ unsigned int start, unsigned int len)
+{
+ struct mbt_grp_ctx *grp_ctx = MBT_GRP_CTX(sb, group);
+
+ mb_set_bits(grp_ctx->bitmap_bh.b_data, start, len);
+}
+
+/* called after mbt_init_sb_layout */
+static int mbt_ctx_init(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ struct mbt_ctx *ctx = MBT_CTX(sb);
+ ext4_group_t i, ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
+
+ ctx->grp_ctx = kcalloc(ngroups, sizeof(struct mbt_grp_ctx),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (ctx->grp_ctx == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++)
+ if (mbt_grp_ctx_init(sb, &ctx->grp_ctx[i]))
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * first data block(first cluster in first group) is used by
+ * metadata, mark it used to avoid to alloc data block at first
+ * block which will fail ext4_sb_block_valid check.
+ */
+ mb_set_bits(ctx->grp_ctx[0].bitmap_bh.b_data, 0, 1);
+
+ return 0;
+out:
+ while (i-- > 0)
+ mbt_grp_ctx_release(&ctx->grp_ctx[i]);
+ kfree(ctx->grp_ctx);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+static void mbt_ctx_release(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ struct mbt_ctx *ctx = MBT_CTX(sb);
+ ext4_group_t i, ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++)
+ mbt_grp_ctx_release(&ctx->grp_ctx[i]);
+ kfree(ctx->grp_ctx);
+}
+
+static struct buffer_head *
+ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait_stub(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group,
+ bool ignore_locked)
+{
+ struct mbt_grp_ctx *grp_ctx = MBT_GRP_CTX(sb, block_group);
+
+ /* paired with brelse from caller of ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait */
+ get_bh(&grp_ctx->bitmap_bh);
+ return &grp_ctx->bitmap_bh;
+}
+
+static int ext4_wait_block_bitmap_stub(struct super_block *sb,
+ ext4_group_t block_group,
+ struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct ext4_group_desc *
+ext4_get_group_desc_stub(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group,
+ struct buffer_head **bh)
+{
+ struct mbt_grp_ctx *grp_ctx = MBT_GRP_CTX(sb, block_group);
+
+ if (bh != NULL)
+ *bh = &grp_ctx->gd_bh;
+
+ return &grp_ctx->desc;
+}
+
+static int ext4_mb_mark_context_stub(struct ext4_mark_context *mc,
+ ext4_group_t group, ext4_grpblk_t blkoff,
+ ext4_grpblk_t len, int flags)
+{
+ struct mbt_grp_ctx *grp_ctx = MBT_GRP_CTX(mc->sb, group);
+ struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = &grp_ctx->bitmap_bh;
+
+ if (mc->state)
+ mb_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, len);
+ else
+ mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, len);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#define TEST_BLOCKSIZE_BITS 10
+#define TEST_CLUSTER_BITS 3
+#define TEST_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP 8192
+#define TEST_GROUP_COUNT 4
+#define TEST_DESC_SIZE 64
+#define TEST_GOAL_GROUP 1
+static int mbt_kunit_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct mbt_ext4_block_layout layout = {
+ .blocksize_bits = TEST_BLOCKSIZE_BITS,
+ .cluster_bits = TEST_CLUSTER_BITS,
+ .blocks_per_group = TEST_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP,
+ .group_count = TEST_GROUP_COUNT,
+ .desc_size = TEST_DESC_SIZE,
+ };
+ struct super_block *sb;
+ int ret;
+
+ sb = mbt_ext4_alloc_super_block();
+ if (sb == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ mbt_init_sb_layout(sb, &layout);
+
+ ret = mbt_ctx_init(sb);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ mbt_ext4_free_super_block(sb);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ test->priv = sb;
+ kunit_activate_static_stub(test,
+ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait,
+ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait_stub);
+ kunit_activate_static_stub(test,
+ ext4_wait_block_bitmap,
+ ext4_wait_block_bitmap_stub);
+ kunit_activate_static_stub(test,
+ ext4_get_group_desc,
+ ext4_get_group_desc_stub);
+ kunit_activate_static_stub(test,
+ ext4_mb_mark_context,
+ ext4_mb_mark_context_stub);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void mbt_kunit_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
+
+ mbt_ctx_release(sb);
+ mbt_ext4_free_super_block(sb);
+}
+
+static void test_new_blocks_simple(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
+ struct inode inode = { .i_sb = sb, };
+ struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
+ ext4_group_t i, goal_group = TEST_GOAL_GROUP;
+ int err = 0;
+ ext4_fsblk_t found;
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+
+ ar.inode = &inode;
+
+ /* get block at goal */
+ ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
+ found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal, found,
+ "failed to alloc block at goal, expected %llu found %llu",
+ ar.goal, found);
+
+ /* get block after goal in goal group */
+ ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
+ found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
+ "failed to alloc block after goal in goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
+ ar.goal + 1, found);
+
+ /* get block after goal group */
+ mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, goal_group, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
+ ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
+ found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found,
+ "failed to alloc block after goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
+ ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found);
+
+ /* get block before goal group */
+ for (i = goal_group; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
+ mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
+ ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
+ found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0) + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
+ "failed to alloc block before goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
+ ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0 + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1)), found);
+
+ /* no block available, fail to allocate block */
+ for (i = 0; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
+ mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
+ ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
+ found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, err, 0,
+ "unexpectedly get block when no block is available");
+}
+
+
+static struct kunit_case mbt_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_new_blocks_simple),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite mbt_test_suite = {
+ .name = "ext4_mballoc_test",
+ .init = mbt_kunit_init,
+ .exit = mbt_kunit_exit,
+ .test_cases = mbt_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&mbt_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 5961b08ae7df..7d230d6317e6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -7041,3 +7041,7 @@ ext4_mballoc_query_range(
return error;
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS
+#include "mballoc-test.c"
+#endif
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-26 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-26 15:50 [PATCH v6 00/11] cleanups and unit test for mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] ext4: factor out codes to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk from ext4_mb_mark_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 12:33 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-31 13:42 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 14:07 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 2:50 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-04 8:30 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_free_blocks_simple Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 14:25 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 2:51 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] ext4: extent ext4_mb_mark_context to support allocation under journal Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 15:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 3:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 2:54 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_mb_clear_bb() Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 9:34 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 3:00 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-12 7:02 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-12 10:13 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-12 11:32 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_clear_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 9:38 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_group_add_blocks() Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context " Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 9:50 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] ext4: add some kunit stub for mballoc kunit test Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 14:18 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2023-09-01 14:29 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] ext4: add first unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple in mballoc Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] ext4: run mballoc test with different layouts setting Kemeng Shi
2023-09-01 14:36 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-04 3:01 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-29 19:02 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] cleanups and unit test for mballoc Ritesh Harjani
2023-08-30 7:22 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-31 14:35 ` Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230826155028.4019470-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).