From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/13] ext4: remove gdb backup copy for meta bg in setup_new_flex_group_blocks
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 01:47:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230826174712.4059355-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230826174712.4059355-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Wrong check of gdb backup in meta bg as following:
first_group is the first group of meta_bg which contains target group, so
target group is always >= first_group. We check if target group has gdb
backup by comparing first_group with [group + 1] and [group +
EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) - 1]. As group >= first_group, then [group + N] is
> first_group. So no copy of gdb backup in meta bg is done in
setup_new_flex_group_blocks.
No need to do gdb backup copy in meta bg from setup_new_flex_group_blocks
as we always copy updated gdb block to backups at end of
ext4_flex_group_add as following:
ext4_flex_group_add
/* no gdb backup copy for meta bg any more */
setup_new_flex_group_blocks
/* update current group number */
ext4_update_super
sbi->s_groups_count += flex_gd->count;
/*
* if group in meta bg contains backup is added, the primary gdb block
* of the meta bg will be copy to backup in new added group here.
*/
for (; gdb_num <= gdb_num_end; gdb_num++)
update_backups(...)
In summary, we can remove wrong gdb backup copy code in
setup_new_flex_group_blocks.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
---
fs/ext4/resize.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index 9cb9ed968599..667381180b26 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -560,13 +560,8 @@ static int setup_new_flex_group_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
if (meta_bg == 0 && !ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group))
goto handle_itb;
- if (meta_bg == 1) {
- ext4_group_t first_group;
- first_group = ext4_meta_bg_first_group(sb, group);
- if (first_group != group + 1 &&
- first_group != group + EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) - 1)
- goto handle_itb;
- }
+ if (meta_bg == 1)
+ goto handle_itb;
block = start + ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group);
/* Copy all of the GDT blocks into the backup in this group */
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-26 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-26 17:46 [PATCH v3 00/13] fixes and cleanups to ext4 resize Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] ext4: correct offset of gdb backup in non meta_bg group to update_backups Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] ext4: add missed brelse in update_backups Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] ext4: correct return value of ext4_convert_meta_bg Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] ext4: fix typo in setup_new_flex_group_blocks Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] ext4: remove redundant check of count Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] ext4: remove commented code in reserve_backup_gdb Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] ext4: calculate free_clusters_count in cluster unit in verify_group_input Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] ext4: remove EXT4FS_DEBUG defination in resize.c Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] ext4: use saved local variable sbi instead of EXT4_SB(sb) Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] ext4: simplify the gdbblock calculation in add_new_gdb_meta_bg Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ext4: remove unnecessary check to avoid repeat update_backups for the same gdb Kemeng Shi
2023-08-26 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] ext4: remove unnecessary initialization of count2 in set_flexbg_block_bitmap Kemeng Shi
2023-10-06 18:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] fixes and cleanups to ext4 resize Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230826174712.4059355-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).