From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] jbd2: Fix potential data lost in recovering journal raced with synchronizing fs bdev
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:14:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230919101438.rjmxut6l2d6ufwnj@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919012525.1783108-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
On Tue 19-09-23 09:25:25, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> JBD2 makes sure journal data is fallen on fs device by sync_blockdev(),
> however, other process could intercept the EIO information from bdev's
> mapping, which leads journal recovering successful even EIO occurs during
> data written back to fs device.
>
> We found this problem in our product, iscsi + multipath is chosen for block
> device of ext4. Unstable network may trigger kpartx to rescan partitions in
> device mapper layer. Detailed process is shown as following:
>
> mount kpartx irq
> jbd2_journal_recover
> do_one_pass
> memcpy(nbh->b_data, obh->b_data) // copy data to fs dev from journal
> mark_buffer_dirty // mark bh dirty
> vfs_read
> generic_file_read_iter // dio
> filemap_write_and_wait_range
> __filemap_fdatawrite_range
> do_writepages
> block_write_full_folio
> submit_bh_wbc
> >> EIO occurs in disk <<
> end_buffer_async_write
> mark_buffer_write_io_error
> mapping_set_error
> set_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // set!
> filemap_check_errors
> test_and_clear_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // clear!
> err2 = sync_blockdev
> filemap_write_and_wait
> filemap_check_errors
> test_and_clear_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // false
> err2 = 0
>
> Filesystem is mounted successfully even data from journal is failed written
> into disk, and ext4/ocfs2 could become corrupted.
>
> Fix it by comparing the wb_err state in fs block device before recovering
> and after recovering.
>
> Fetch a reproducer in [Link].
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217888
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> ---
> v1->v3: Initialize wb_err. Untialized wb_err could be same with
> mapping->wb_err(eg. EIO without ERRSEQ_SEEN). When EIO
> occurs again, mapping->wb_err won't be changed, and wb_err
> is still same with mapping->wb_err.
Yeah, good catch. The patch still looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> fs/jbd2/recovery.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
> index c269a7d29a46..5b771a3d8d9a 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
> @@ -289,6 +289,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_recover(journal_t *journal)
> journal_superblock_t * sb;
>
> struct recovery_info info;
> + errseq_t wb_err;
> + struct address_space *mapping;
>
> memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
> sb = journal->j_superblock;
> @@ -306,6 +308,9 @@ int jbd2_journal_recover(journal_t *journal)
> return 0;
> }
>
> + wb_err = 0;
> + mapping = journal->j_fs_dev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
> + errseq_check_and_advance(&mapping->wb_err, &wb_err);
> err = do_one_pass(journal, &info, PASS_SCAN);
> if (!err)
> err = do_one_pass(journal, &info, PASS_REVOKE);
> @@ -327,6 +332,9 @@ int jbd2_journal_recover(journal_t *journal)
>
> jbd2_journal_clear_revoke(journal);
> err2 = sync_blockdev(journal->j_fs_dev);
> + if (!err)
> + err = err2;
> + err2 = errseq_check_and_advance(&mapping->wb_err, &wb_err);
> if (!err)
> err = err2;
> /* Make sure all replayed data is on permanent storage */
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 1:25 [PATCH v3] jbd2: Fix potential data lost in recovering journal raced with synchronizing fs bdev Zhihao Cheng
2023-09-19 10:14 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-10-06 18:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230919101438.rjmxut6l2d6ufwnj@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).