From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/6] ext4: correct the hole length returned by ext4_map_blocks()
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:34:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231121093429.1827390-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231121093429.1827390-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
In ext4_map_blocks(), if we can't find a range of mapping in the
extents cache, we are calling ext4_ext_map_blocks() to search the real
path. But if the querying range was tail overlaped by a delayed extent,
we can't find it on the real extent path, so the returned hole length
could be larger than it really is.
| querying map |
v v
|----------{-------------}{------|----------------}-----...
^ ^ ^^ ^
| uncached | hole extent || delayed extent |
We have to adjust the mapping length to the next not hole extent's
lblk before searching the extent path.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 4ce35f1c8b0a..94e7b8500878 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
struct ext4_map_blocks *map, int flags)
{
struct extent_status es;
+ ext4_lblk_t next;
int retval;
int ret = 0;
#ifdef ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST
@@ -502,8 +503,10 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
/* Lookup extent status tree firstly */
- if (!(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY) &&
- ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, NULL, &es)) {
+ if (EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY)
+ goto uncached;
+
+ if (ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, NULL, &es)) {
if (ext4_es_is_written(&es) || ext4_es_is_unwritten(&es)) {
map->m_pblk = ext4_es_pblock(&es) +
map->m_lblk - es.es_lblk;
@@ -532,6 +535,23 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
#endif
goto found;
}
+ /*
+ * Not found, maybe a hole, need to adjust the map length before
+ * seraching the real extent path. It can prevent incorrect hole
+ * length returned if the following entries have delayed only
+ * ones.
+ */
+ if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE) && es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk) {
+ next = es.es_lblk;
+ if (ext4_es_is_hole(&es))
+ next = ext4_es_skip_hole_extent(inode, map->m_lblk,
+ map->m_len);
+ retval = next - map->m_lblk;
+ if (map->m_len > retval)
+ map->m_len = retval;
+ }
+
+uncached:
/*
* In the query cache no-wait mode, nothing we can do more if we
* cannot find extent in the cache.
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-21 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-21 9:34 [RFC PATCH 0/6] ext4: make ext4_map_blocks() recognize delayed only extent Zhang Yi
2023-11-21 9:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] ext4: introduce ext4_es_skip_hole_extent() to skip hole extents Zhang Yi
2023-11-21 9:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] ext4: make ext4_es_lookup_extent() return the next extent if not found Zhang Yi
2023-11-21 9:34 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2023-12-13 18:21 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] ext4: correct the hole length returned by ext4_map_blocks() Jan Kara
2023-12-14 9:18 ` Zhang Yi
2023-12-14 14:31 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-15 4:36 ` Zhang Yi
2023-11-21 9:34 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] ext4: add a hole extent entry in cache after punch Zhang Yi
2023-11-21 9:34 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] ext4: make ext4_map_blocks() distinguish delayed only mapping Zhang Yi
2023-11-21 9:34 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] ext4: make ext4_set_iomap() recognize IOMAP_DELALLOC mapping type Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231121093429.1827390-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).