Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] ext2: Convert ext2 regular file buffered I/O to use iomap
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 09:58:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231207085831.udom5ozzsdqucxzm@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fs0gisi5.fsf@doe.com>

On Tue 05-12-23 20:52:26, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> writes:
> >>  static int ext2_write_map_blocks(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
> >>  				 struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
> >>  {
> >> -	if (offset >= wpc->iomap.offset &&
> >> -	    offset < wpc->iomap.offset + wpc->iomap.length)
> >> +	loff_t maxblocks = (loff_t)INT_MAX;
> >> +	u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
> >> +	u32 bno;
> >> +	bool new, boundary;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	if (ext2_imap_valid(wpc, inode, offset))
> >>  		return 0;
> >>  
> >> -	return ext2_iomap_begin(inode, offset, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize,
> >> +	EXT2_WPC(wpc)->ib_seq = READ_ONCE(EXT2_I(inode)->ib_seq);
> >> +
> >> +	ret = ext2_get_blocks(inode, offset >> blkbits, maxblocks << blkbits,
> >> +			      &bno, &new, &boundary, 0);
> >
> > This is incorrectly ordered. ext2_get_blocks() bumps ib_seq when it
> > does allocation, so the newly stored EXT2_WPC(wpc)->ib_seq is
> > immediately staled and the very next call to ext2_imap_valid() will
> > fail, causing a new iomap to be mapped even when not necessary.
> 
> In case of ext2 here, the allocation happens at the write time itself
> for buffered writes. So what we are essentially doing here (at the time
> of writeback) is querying ->get_blocks(..., create=0) and passing those
> no. of blocks (ret) further. So it is unlikely that the block
> allocations will happen right after we sample ib_seq
> (unless we race with truncate).
> 
> For mmapped writes, we expect to find a hole and in case of a hole at
> the offset, we only pass & cache 1 block in wpc. 
> 
> For mmapped writes case since we go and allocate 1 block, so I agree
> that the ib_seq will change right after in ->get_blocks. But since in
> this case we only alloc and cache 1 block, we anyway will have to call
> ->get_blocks irrespective of ib_seq checking.

I agree with your reasoning Ritesh but I guess it would deserve a comment
because it is a bit subtle and easily forgotten detail.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-07  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1700506526.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
2023-11-20 19:05 ` [RFC 1/3] ext2: Fix ki_pos update for DIO buffered-io fallback case Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-11-21  4:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-21  5:36     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-22  6:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-20 19:05 ` [RFC 2/3] ext2: Convert ext2 regular file buffered I/O to use iomap Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-11-20 20:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-21  4:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-21  5:56     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-21  6:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-21  6:15         ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-22 12:29   ` Jan Kara
2023-11-22 13:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-22 20:26       ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30  3:24         ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30  4:22           ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-30  4:37             ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30  4:30           ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-30  5:27             ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30  8:22             ` Zhang Yi
2023-11-30  7:45           ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30 10:18             ` Jan Kara
2023-11-30 10:59               ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30 14:08                 ` Jan Kara
2023-11-30 15:50                   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-30 16:01                     ` Jan Kara
2023-11-30 16:03                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-01 23:09           ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-05 15:22             ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-12-07  8:58               ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-11-22 22:26       ` Dave Chinner
2023-11-23  4:09         ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-23  7:09           ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  5:37             ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-29  6:32               ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  9:19           ` Dave Chinner
2023-11-23  7:02         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-22 20:25     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-20 19:05 ` [RFC 3/3] ext2: Enable large folio support Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-11-20 20:00   ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231207085831.udom5ozzsdqucxzm@quack3 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox