From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@interlinx.bc.ca>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e2scrub finds corruption immediately after mounting
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:55:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104045540.GD36164@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536d25b24364eaf11a38b47e853008c3115d82b8.camel@interlinx.bc.ca>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 04:14:36PM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I am trying to migrate from lvcheck
> (https://github.com/BryanKadzban/lvcheck) to using the officially
> supported e2scrub[_all] kit.
>
> I am finding that e2scrub very often (much more than lvcheck even)
> finds corruption and wants me to do an offline e2fsck. Not only does
> it do this immediately after booting a system that includes filesystem
> checks (that were caused by e2scrub previously setting a filesystem to
> be checked on next boot), but it happens immediately after I run an
> e2fsck and then mount the filesystem, even without any activity on it.
> Observe:
>
> # umount /opt
> # e2fsck -y /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt
> e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
> /dev/mapper/rootvol_tmp-almalinux8_opt: clean, 1698/178816 files,
> 482404/716800 blocks
> # e2scrub /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt
> Logical volume "almalinux8_opt.e2scrub" created.
> e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt.e2scrub: 1698/178816 files (86.9% non-
> contiguous), 482404/716800 blocks
> /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt: Scrub succeeded.
> tune2fs 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
> Setting current mount count to 0
> Setting time filesystem last checked to Wed Jan 3 11:37:04 2024
>
> Logical volume "almalinux8_opt.e2scrub" successfully removed.
> # mount /opt
> # e2scrub /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt
> Logical volume "almalinux8_opt.e2scrub" created.
> e2fsck 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt.e2scrub: 1698/178816 files (86.9% non-
> contiguous), 482404/716800 blocks
> /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt: Scrub FAILED due to corruption!
Curious. Normally e2scrub will run e2fsck twice: Once in journal-only
preen mode to replay the journal, then again with -fy to perform the
full filesystem (snapshot) check.
I wonder if you would paste the output of
"bash -x e2scrub /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt" here? I'd be curious
to see what the command flow is.
Assuming that 1.47.0 doesn't magically fix it. :)
> Unmount and run e2fsck -y.
> tune2fs 1.45.6 (20-Mar-2020)
> Setting filesystem error flag to force fsck.
> Logical volume "almalinux8_opt.e2scrub" successfully removed.
>
> So as you can see, I unmount /opt, run an e2fsck -y on it to clean it
> and then before mounting run e2scrub and it finds the filesystem clean.
> Good so far.
>
> I then mount it and then immediately run another e2scrub on it and that
> finds it dirty and wants me to unmount and run another e2fsck -y on it.
> But how can that be? Surely an e2scrub on a freshly cleaned and
> mounted filesystem (with no activity on it in between) should be clean,
> yes?
Right. Unless something's broken in e2fsck. :/
--D
>
> Cheers,
> b.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 21:14 e2scrub finds corruption immediately after mounting Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-04 4:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-01-04 14:10 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-04 4:55 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-01-04 14:13 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-08 12:52 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-09 6:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-10 5:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-10 13:44 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-10 18:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-10 23:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-01-16 13:29 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-16 13:22 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-17 19:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-01-17 22:20 ` Brian J. Murrell
2024-01-04 14:37 ` Brian J. Murrell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240104045540.GD36164@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brian@interlinx.bc.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).