linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jaegeuk@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	amir73il@gmail.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] fscrypt: Ignore plaintext dentries during d_move
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:55:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131005510.GD2020@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240129204330.32346-7-krisman@suse.de>

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 05:43:24PM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Now that we do more than just clear the DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME in
> fscrypt_handle_d_move, skip it entirely for plaintext dentries, to avoid
> extra costs.
> 
> Note that VFS will call this function for any dentry, whether the volume
> has fscrypt on not.  But, since we only care about DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME, we
> can check for that, to avoid touching the superblock for other fields
> that identify a fscrypt volume.
> 
> Note also that fscrypt_handle_d_move is hopefully inlined back into
> __d_move, so the call cost is not significant.  Considering that
> DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME is a fscrypt-specific flag, we do the check in fscrypt
> code instead of the caller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
> 
> ---
> Changes since v4:
>   - Check based on the dentry itself (eric)
> ---
>  include/linux/fscrypt.h | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> index c1e285053b3e..ab668760d63e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> @@ -232,6 +232,15 @@ static inline bool fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(const struct inode *inode)
>   */
>  static inline void fscrypt_handle_d_move(struct dentry *dentry)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * VFS calls fscrypt_handle_d_move even for non-fscrypt
> +	 * filesystems.  Since we only care about DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME
> +	 * dentries here, check that to bail out quickly, if possible.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME))
> +		return;

I think you're over-complicating this a bit.  This should be merged with patch
5, since this is basically fixing patch 5, and the end result should look like:

/*
 * When d_splice_alias() moves a directory's no-key alias to its plaintext alias
 * as a result of the encryption key being added, DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME must be
 * cleared and there might be an opportunity to disable d_revalidate.  Note that
 * we don't have to support the inverse operation because fscrypt doesn't allow
 * no-key names to be the source or target of a rename().
 */
static inline void fscrypt_handle_d_move(struct dentry *dentry)
{
	if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME) {
		dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME;
		if (dentry->d_op->d_revalidate == fscrypt_d_revalidate)
			dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE;
	}
}

Note that checking for NULL dentry->d_op is not necessary, since it's already
been verified that DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME is set, which means fscrypt is in use,
which means that there are dentry_operations.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31  0:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-29 20:43 [PATCH v5 00/12] Set casefold/fscrypt dentry operations through sb->s_d_op Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] ovl: Reject mounting over case-insensitive directories Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31  0:22   ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-31  0:31     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] fscrypt: Factor out a helper to configure the lookup dentry Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31  0:29   ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] fscrypt: Call fscrypt_prepare_lookup_dentry on unencrypted dentries Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] fscrypt: Drop d_revalidate for valid dentries during lookup Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31  0:47   ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-31 18:35     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-01  3:24       ` Eric Biggers
2024-02-02 14:50         ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-09 14:03           ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 14:46             ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] fscrypt: Drop d_revalidate once the key is added Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] fscrypt: Ignore plaintext dentries during d_move Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31  0:55   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] libfs: Merge encrypted_ci_dentry_ops and ci_dentry_ops Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-31  1:00   ` Eric Biggers
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] libfs: Add helper to choose dentry operations at mount-time Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] ext4: Configure dentry operations at dentry-creation time Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-02-02 15:56   ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] f2fs: " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] ubifs: " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-01-29 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] libfs: Drop generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240131005510.GD2020@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=krisman@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).