From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1535E19A; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707956666; cv=none; b=jkz9LE8fBE+Z7MhNFxkoDTlgwMfOMB4ozHB4nYp9XNA2PXZ+QCjmlFpWwXd0Upf6ISy91Jkh9bmxp/VgyGjaikyYL7jXD6amu4eVFtRXns/6MpEHkl5o8H69uQZdAsmPDeAAXYYVIwtxr8rVXLJlya6VGAJN79ADzamutIzepTc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707956666; c=relaxed/simple; bh=59cH34O2OWkKVZjG9GgdkKelHOHZV98dvK1VvoxsuNw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uuMd7eYJUiO+OyKAbQYZHr3ZYfU1txlc30yoX/xjmcG9MIEG7+zVvTOTWzc5un9mHVbbOaERxY6+ucpwBlr7I+lYJdZb5374KL/gPO/CHKAqF2zP2QF1GAhzCqZ1dye6KLdodni/pCEDUUjIiQDkCLfjUnx/dyUuD2fq4BiMxLM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hrK5g6Ne; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hrK5g6Ne" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3713FC433C7; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:24:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707956665; bh=59cH34O2OWkKVZjG9GgdkKelHOHZV98dvK1VvoxsuNw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hrK5g6NegFC+QhqrQea4HSmqTdiC9Ka/gx0p2n7jiipIgWksWr24/0BVRwkNjluCO o/mA4cjWmL+WNNbSUwu1cH2syPViHbh7mITciDFdhaMCXuxgQb1c0suVhPiV7ViTp4 ncP94sqOe852oIomjyUZT4yz5pxRVbglAV2iZOjOQHcF0MwWecT5ZK+kVShnJlfvNY OykMsWyj4W+fUb6iZ5pVyPKpNc3tVavEbiWfVhg9eOlNlmVArIP5dRJf6RCvhpaXDh oqcrmyOzsFiY7kqCA9BzFxTZCbrJRiQa6bzILtTeVdf4wv05i3k6HPWJd9IJH19vEP KMzA0kaGVqA3g== Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:24:23 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jaegeuk@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, amir73il@gmail.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Set casefold/fscrypt dentry operations through sb->s_d_op Message-ID: <20240215002423.GJ1638@sol.localdomain> References: <20240213021321.1804-1-krisman@suse.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240213021321.1804-1-krisman@suse.de> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:13:11PM -0500, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > Hi, > > v6 of this patchset applying the comments from Eric and the suggestion from > Christian. Thank you for your feedback. > > Eric, since this is getting close to merging, how do you want to handle > it? I will take patch 1 through my tree already, are you fine if I merge > this through unicode or do you want to take it through fscrypt? > > As usual, this survived fstests on ext4 and f2fs. I think you should just take the whole series through the unicode tree. If I understand correctly, this series is really about fixing things for casefolding support, not fscrypt support, right? There is a lot of interaction between the two, but ultimately it's casefold that gets fixed. - Eric