Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fstest generic/696 failure on ext4 fs with quotas+idmap
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:26:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222-knast-reifen-953312ce17a9@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jzmxisqm.fsf@suse.de>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 06:20:49PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> The fstest generic/696 (and 697) fail on ext4 when the filesystem is
> created with quota support (-O quota).  It's really easy to reproduce, and
> it fails when doing the idmapped tests (setgid_create_umask_idmapped() and
> setgid_create_umask_idmapped_in_userns()).
> 
> The failure happens when the test does an openat() with O_TMPFILE:
> 
>   ext4_tmpfile()
>     __ext4_new_inode()
>       dquot_initialize()
>         dqget()
> 
> and at this point the error occurs:
> 
> 	if (!qid_has_mapping(sb->s_user_ns, qid))
> 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
> qid is '-1', which is invalid, but I'm failing to understand if it should
> really be invalid or if dqget() should handle this invalid qid some other
> way.  Earlier, __ext4_new_inode() called inode_init_owner(), which indeed
> sets inode->i_uid with '-1'.

I think that's a misanalysis? The dquot_initialize happens to be before
the inode creation for that tmpfile. Anyway, see below.

> 
> I've been trying to figure it out, but it's very tricky to follow all the
> details, so I decided to ask here and see if anyone has any idea.  Is this
> a known issue?  Maybe the issue is with the test itself, and not with
> ext4, quota or idmapped code.

So good new is that it's neither an ext4, quota, or idmapped bug. It's
just the test being broken because openat_tmpfile_supported() is called
after we created an idmapped mount on the idmapped mount which means
that the callers fs{g,u}id might not be mapped. That means
make_kquid_*id() will return INVALID_*ID which will later fail that
check whether the qid is mapped in dqget().

I sent a patch to xfstests with you can ext4 Cced. I've tested it here
and it's fixed. Feel free to test as well.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 18:20 fstest generic/696 failure on ext4 fs with quotas+idmap Luis Henriques
2024-02-22 13:23 ` [PATCH] vfs: fix check for tmpfile support Christian Brauner
2024-02-22 14:05   ` Luis Henriques
2024-02-25 15:56     ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-26  8:56       ` Luis Henriques
2024-02-22 13:26 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-02-22 13:53   ` fstest generic/696 failure on ext4 fs with quotas+idmap Luis Henriques

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240222-knast-reifen-953312ce17a9@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox