From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fstest generic/696 failure on ext4 fs with quotas+idmap
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:26:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222-knast-reifen-953312ce17a9@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jzmxisqm.fsf@suse.de>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 06:20:49PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The fstest generic/696 (and 697) fail on ext4 when the filesystem is
> created with quota support (-O quota). It's really easy to reproduce, and
> it fails when doing the idmapped tests (setgid_create_umask_idmapped() and
> setgid_create_umask_idmapped_in_userns()).
>
> The failure happens when the test does an openat() with O_TMPFILE:
>
> ext4_tmpfile()
> __ext4_new_inode()
> dquot_initialize()
> dqget()
>
> and at this point the error occurs:
>
> if (!qid_has_mapping(sb->s_user_ns, qid))
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> qid is '-1', which is invalid, but I'm failing to understand if it should
> really be invalid or if dqget() should handle this invalid qid some other
> way. Earlier, __ext4_new_inode() called inode_init_owner(), which indeed
> sets inode->i_uid with '-1'.
I think that's a misanalysis? The dquot_initialize happens to be before
the inode creation for that tmpfile. Anyway, see below.
>
> I've been trying to figure it out, but it's very tricky to follow all the
> details, so I decided to ask here and see if anyone has any idea. Is this
> a known issue? Maybe the issue is with the test itself, and not with
> ext4, quota or idmapped code.
So good new is that it's neither an ext4, quota, or idmapped bug. It's
just the test being broken because openat_tmpfile_supported() is called
after we created an idmapped mount on the idmapped mount which means
that the callers fs{g,u}id might not be mapped. That means
make_kquid_*id() will return INVALID_*ID which will later fail that
check whether the qid is mapped in dqget().
I sent a patch to xfstests with you can ext4 Cced. I've tested it here
and it's fixed. Feel free to test as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 18:20 fstest generic/696 failure on ext4 fs with quotas+idmap Luis Henriques
2024-02-22 13:23 ` [PATCH] vfs: fix check for tmpfile support Christian Brauner
2024-02-22 14:05 ` Luis Henriques
2024-02-25 15:56 ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-26 8:56 ` Luis Henriques
2024-02-22 13:26 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-02-22 13:53 ` fstest generic/696 failure on ext4 fs with quotas+idmap Luis Henriques
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240222-knast-reifen-953312ce17a9@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox