From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
<adobriyan@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
<libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] ext4: add new attr pointer attr_mb_order
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:11:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240227091148.178435-6-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227091148.178435-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
The s_mb_best_avail_max_trim_order is of type unsigned int, and has a
range of values well beyond the normal use of the mb_order. Although the
mballoc code is careful enough that large numbers don't matter there, but
this can mislead the sysadmin into thinking that it's normal to set such
values. Hence add a new attr_id attr_mb_order with values in the range
[0, 64] to avoid storing garbage values and make us more resilient to
surprises in the future.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/sysfs.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
index ddd71673176c..8e0473169458 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ typedef enum {
attr_first_error_time,
attr_last_error_time,
attr_clusters_in_group,
+ attr_mb_order,
attr_feature,
attr_pointer_ui,
attr_pointer_ul,
@@ -210,6 +211,8 @@ EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(inode_readahead_blks, 0644, inode_readahead,
ext4_sb_info, s_inode_readahead_blks);
EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(mb_group_prealloc, 0644, clusters_in_group,
ext4_sb_info, s_mb_group_prealloc);
+EXT4_ATTR_OFFSET(mb_best_avail_max_trim_order, 0644, mb_order,
+ ext4_sb_info, s_mb_best_avail_max_trim_order);
EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(inode_goal, s_inode_goal);
EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stats, s_mb_stats);
EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_to_scan, s_mb_max_to_scan);
@@ -225,7 +228,6 @@ EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_warning_ratelimit_state.int
EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(warning_ratelimit_burst, s_warning_ratelimit_state.burst);
EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(msg_ratelimit_interval_ms, s_msg_ratelimit_state.interval);
EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(msg_ratelimit_burst, s_msg_ratelimit_state.burst);
-EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_best_avail_max_trim_order, s_mb_best_avail_max_trim_order);
#ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG
EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UL(simulate_fail, s_simulate_fail);
#endif
@@ -379,6 +381,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_show(struct ext4_attr *a,
switch (a->attr_id) {
case attr_inode_readahead:
case attr_clusters_in_group:
+ case attr_mb_order:
case attr_pointer_ui:
if (a->attr_ptr == ptr_ext4_super_block_offset)
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", le32_to_cpup(ptr));
@@ -458,6 +461,14 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_attr_store(struct ext4_attr *a,
else
*((unsigned int *) ptr) = t;
return len;
+ case attr_mb_order:
+ ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ if (t > 64)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ *((unsigned int *) ptr) = t;
+ return len;
case attr_clusters_in_group:
ret = kstrtouint(skip_spaces(buf), 0, &t);
if (ret)
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 9:11 [PATCH v2 0/9] ext4: avoid sysfs variables overflow causing BUG_ON/SOOB Baokun Li
2024-02-27 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ext4: avoid overflow when setting values via sysfs Baokun Li
2024-03-14 10:16 ` Jan Kara
2024-02-27 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] ext4: refactor out ext4_generic_attr_store() Baokun Li
2024-03-14 10:18 ` Jan Kara
2024-02-27 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ext4: refactor out ext4_generic_attr_show() Baokun Li
2024-02-27 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] ext4: fix slab-out-of-bounds in ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists() Baokun Li
2024-03-14 10:30 ` Jan Kara
2024-03-14 11:24 ` Baokun Li
2024-03-14 12:00 ` Jan Kara
2024-03-14 12:37 ` Baokun Li
2024-03-14 12:50 ` Jan Kara
2024-03-14 13:47 ` Baokun Li
2024-02-27 9:11 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2024-03-14 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] ext4: add new attr pointer attr_mb_order Jan Kara
2024-02-27 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] ext4: add positive int attr pointer to avoid sysfs variables overflow Baokun Li
2024-03-14 10:33 ` Jan Kara
2024-02-27 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] ext4: set type of ac_groups_linear_remaining to __u32 to avoid overflow Baokun Li
2024-02-27 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ext4: set the type of max_zeroout to unsigned int " Baokun Li
2024-03-14 10:35 ` Jan Kara
2024-02-27 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ext4: clean up s_mb_rb_lock to fix build warnings with C=1 Baokun Li
2024-03-14 10:36 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240227091148.178435-6-libaokun1@huawei.com \
--to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox