public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: replace deprecated strncpy with alternatives
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:11:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202403282109.D174F1CE@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240321-strncpy-fs-ext4-file-c-v1-1-36a6a09fef0c@google.com>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 01:03:10AM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
> [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
> interfaces.
> 
> in file.c:
> s_last_mounted is marked as __nonstring meaning it does not need to be
> NUL-terminated. Let's instead use strtomem_pad() to copy bytes from the
> string source to the byte array destination -- while also ensuring to
> pad with zeroes.
> 
> in ioctl.c:
> We can drop the memset and size argument in favor of using the new
> 2-argument version of strscpy_pad() -- which was introduced with Commit
> e6584c3964f2f ("string: Allow 2-argument strscpy()"). This guarantees
> NUL-termination and NUL-padding on the destination buffer -- which seems
> to be a requirement judging from this comment:
> 
> |	static int ext4_ioctl_getlabel(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, char __user *user_label)
> |	{
> |		char label[EXT4_LABEL_MAX + 1];
> |
> |		/*
> |		 * EXT4_LABEL_MAX must always be smaller than FSLABEL_MAX because
> |		 * FSLABEL_MAX must include terminating null byte, while s_volume_name
> |		 * does not have to.
> |		 */
> 
> in super.c:
> s_first_error_func is marked as __nonstring meaning we can take the same
> approach as in file.c; just use strtomem_pad()
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
> Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html [2]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
> ---
> Note: build-tested only.
> 
> Found with: $ rg "strncpy\("
> ---
>  fs/ext4/file.c  | 3 +--
>  fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 3 +--
>  fs/ext4/super.c | 7 +++----
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index 54d6ff22585c..c675c0eb5f7e 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -844,8 +844,7 @@ static int ext4_sample_last_mounted(struct super_block *sb,
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out_journal;
>  	lock_buffer(sbi->s_sbh);
> -	strncpy(sbi->s_es->s_last_mounted, cp,
> -		sizeof(sbi->s_es->s_last_mounted));
> +	strtomem_pad(sbi->s_es->s_last_mounted, cp, 0);
>  	ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb);
>  	unlock_buffer(sbi->s_sbh);
>  	ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, sbi->s_sbh);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> index 7160a71044c8..dab7acd49709 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> @@ -1150,9 +1150,8 @@ static int ext4_ioctl_getlabel(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, char __user *user_label
>  	 */
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(EXT4_LABEL_MAX >= FSLABEL_MAX);
>  
> -	memset(label, 0, sizeof(label));
>  	lock_buffer(sbi->s_sbh);
> -	strncpy(label, sbi->s_es->s_volume_name, EXT4_LABEL_MAX);
> +	strscpy_pad(label, sbi->s_es->s_volume_name);
>  	unlock_buffer(sbi->s_sbh);

The only reason I can imagine the memset() being split here is to keep
it out of the spinlock. For a non-fast-path ioctl, I can't imagine this
being a meaningful reduction in lock contention, though.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-29  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-21  1:03 [PATCH] ext4: replace deprecated strncpy with alternatives Justin Stitt
2024-03-29  4:11 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-04-24 23:59 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-03  4:01 ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202403282109.D174F1CE@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox