From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jack@suse.cz, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] Minor improvements and cleanups to ext4 mballoc
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:18:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424061904.987525-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
v2->v3:
-Coleect RVB from Jan
-Remove more unneeded "cr =" in comment
v1->v2:
-Collect RVB from Jan and Ojaswin
-Rewrite changelog of "ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_free_simple to free
continuous bits in found chunk"
-Remove "cr =" in comment of criteria name as criteria name has CR_
prfefix now.
-Only open codeing repeated checks in next_linear_group
This series contains some minor improvements and cleanups to ext4
mballoc. No failure is found in "kvm-xfstests smoke" test and unit
test. More details can be found in respective patches. Thanks!
Kemeng Shi (5):
ext4: keep "prefetch_grp" and "nr" consistent
ext4: add test_mb_mark_used_cost to estimate cost of mb_mark_used
ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_free_simple to free continuous bits in found
chunk
ext4: use correct criteria name instead stale integer number in
comment
ext4: open coding repeated check in next_linear_group
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 9 +++--
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 4 +-
4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
--
2.30.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 6:18 Kemeng Shi [this message]
2024-04-24 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ext4: keep "prefetch_grp" and "nr" consistent Kemeng Shi
2024-04-24 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ext4: add test_mb_mark_used_cost to estimate cost of mb_mark_used Kemeng Shi
2024-04-24 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_free_simple to free continuous bits in found chunk Kemeng Shi
2024-04-29 16:46 ` Jan Kara
2024-04-24 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ext4: use correct criteria name instead stale integer number in comment Kemeng Shi
2024-04-24 20:13 ` Jan Kara
2024-04-24 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ext4: open coding repeated check in next_linear_group Kemeng Shi
2024-05-07 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Minor improvements and cleanups to ext4 mballoc Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240424061904.987525-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).