From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, tytso@mit.edu, dchinner@redhat.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
jack@suse.com, chandan.babu@oracle.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@oracle.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, agruenba@redhat.com,
miklos@szeredi.hu, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 17/22] fs: Add FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES flag
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:39:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240607143919.2622319-18-john.g.garry@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607143919.2622319-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Add a flag indicating that a regular file is enabled for atomic writes.
This is a file attribute that mirrors an ondisk inode flag. Actual support
for untorn file writes (for now) depends on both the iflag and the
underlying storage devices, which we can only really check at statx and
pwritev2() time. This is the same story as FS_XFLAG_DAX, which signals to
the fs that we should try to enable the fsdax IO path on the file (instead
of the regular page cache), but applications have to query STAT_ATTR_DAX
to find out if they really got that IO path.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
index 6a6bcb53594a..0eae5383a0b4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ struct fsxattr {
#define FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE 0x00010000 /* CoW extent size allocator hint */
/* data extent mappings for regular files must be aligned to extent size hint */
#define FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN 0x00020000
+#define FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES 0x00040000 /* atomic writes enabled */
#define FS_XFLAG_HASATTR 0x80000000 /* no DIFLAG for this */
/* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-07 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 14:38 [PATCH v4 00/22] block atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2024-06-07 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/22] fs: Add generic_atomic_write_valid_size() John Garry
2024-06-12 21:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-13 7:35 ` John Garry
2024-06-20 21:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-07 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/22] iomap: Allow filesystems set IO block zeroing size John Garry
2024-06-12 21:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-13 10:31 ` John Garry
2024-06-21 21:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24 13:58 ` John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] xfs: Use extent size granularity for iomap->io_block_size John Garry
2024-06-12 21:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-13 11:13 ` John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/22] xfs: only allow minlen allocations when near ENOSPC John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/22] xfs: always tail align maxlen allocations John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/22] xfs: simplify extent allocation alignment John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 07/22] xfs: make EOF allocation simpler John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 08/22] xfs: introduce forced allocation alignment John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/22] xfs: align args->minlen for " John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 10/22] xfs: Introduce FORCEALIGN inode flag John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/22] xfs: Do not free EOF blocks for forcealign John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/22] xfs: Update xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize_fsb() " John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 13/22] xfs: Unmap blocks according to forcealign John Garry
2024-06-11 10:08 ` John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 14/22] xfs: Only free full extents for forcealign John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 15/22] xfs: Don't revert allocated offset " John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 16/22] xfs: Enable file data forcealign feature John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` John Garry [this message]
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 18/22] iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for forcealign John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 20/22] xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 21/22] xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-06-07 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 22/22] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240607143919.2622319-18-john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox