From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: dax: Fix overflowing extents beyond inode size when partially writing
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 21:30:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240809193014.la7uj6rdxfz5p4sl@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240809121532.2105494-1-chengzhihao@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri 09-08-24 20:15:32, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
>
> The dax_iomap_rw() does two things in each iteration: map written blocks
> and copy user data to blocks. If the process is killed by user(See signal
> handling in dax_iomap_iter()), the copied data will be returned and added
> on inode size, which means that the length of written extents may exceed
> the inode size, then fsck will fail. An example is given as:
>
> dd if=/dev/urandom of=file bs=4M count=1
> dax_iomap_rw
> iomap_iter // round 1
> ext4_iomap_begin
> ext4_iomap_alloc // allocate 0~2M extents(written flag)
> dax_iomap_iter // copy 2M data
> iomap_iter // round 2
> iomap_iter_advance
> iter->pos += iter->processed // iter->pos = 2M
> ext4_iomap_begin
> ext4_iomap_alloc // allocate 2~4M extents(written flag)
> dax_iomap_iter
> fatal_signal_pending
> done = iter->pos - iocb->ki_pos // done = 2M
> ext4_handle_inode_extension
> ext4_update_inode_size // inode size = 2M
>
> fsck reports: Inode 13, i_size is 2097152, should be 4194304. Fix?
>
> Fix the problem by truncating extents if the written length is smaller
> than expected.
>
> Fixes: 776722e85d3b ("ext4: DAX iomap write support")
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219136
> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Good catch! Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/file.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index c89e434db6b7..be061bb64067 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -334,10 +334,10 @@ static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> * Clean up the inode after DIO or DAX extending write has completed and the
> * inode size has been updated using ext4_handle_inode_extension().
> */
> -static void ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(struct inode *inode, ssize_t count)
> +static void ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(struct inode *inode, bool need_trunc)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held_write(&inode->i_rwsem);
> - if (count < 0) {
> + if (need_trunc) {
> ext4_truncate_failed_write(inode);
> /*
> * If the truncate operation failed early, then the inode may
> @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> * writeback of delalloc blocks.
> */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EIOCBQUEUED);
> - ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(inode, ret);
> + ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(inode, ret < 0);
> }
>
> out:
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ ext4_dax_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>
> if (extend) {
> ret = ext4_handle_inode_extension(inode, offset, ret);
> - ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(inode, ret);
> + ext4_inode_extension_cleanup(inode, ret < (ssize_t)count);
> }
> out:
> inode_unlock(inode);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-09 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-09 12:15 [PATCH] ext4: dax: Fix overflowing extents beyond inode size when partially writing Zhihao Cheng
2024-08-09 19:30 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2024-08-27 12:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240809193014.la7uj6rdxfz5p4sl@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=chengzhihao@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox