From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ext4: avoid buffer_head leak in ext4_mark_inode_used
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 07:49:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240815144905.GA6039@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d75ab7f-0fad-07ef-bbcb-3fed16a5170e@huaweicloud.com>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 09:17:10PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>
>
> on 8/15/2024 5:55 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Release inode_bitmap_bh from ext4_read_inode_bitmap in
> >> ext4_mark_inode_used to avoid buffer_head leak.
> >> By the way, remove unneeded goto for invalid ino when inode_bitmap_bh
> >> is NULL.
> >
> > 1. I suggest to split such changes into separate update steps.
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.11-rc3#n81
> It's acceptable to me, but I'm not sure if it worth separate patches
> to others. I will do separate in next version if no person is against
> this.
No, that suggestion is stupid. There's no reason to generate even more
patches for a three line fix, it's very obvious that you're fixing a
missing resource release and rearranging the first error out
accordingly.
--D
> > 2. How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
> >
> > 3. Would you like to append parentheses to any function names?
> Thanks for remind me of these. I will improve the series in next
> version.
>
> Thanks,
> Kemeng
> >
> > Regards,
> > Markus
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-15 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 12:07 [PATCH 0/7] Fixes and cleanups to ext4 ialloc Kemeng Shi
2024-08-13 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/7] ext4: avoid buffer_head leak in ext4_mark_inode_used Kemeng Shi
2024-08-15 9:55 ` Markus Elfring
2024-08-15 13:17 ` Kemeng Shi
2024-08-15 14:49 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-08-16 6:56 ` Markus Elfring
2024-08-16 16:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-08-13 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/7] ext4: avoid potential buffer_head leak in __ext4_new_inode Kemeng Shi
2024-08-14 8:48 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-15 1:36 ` Kemeng Shi
2024-08-13 12:07 ` [PATCH 3/7] ext4: avoid negative min_clusters in find_group_orlov Kemeng Shi
2024-08-13 12:07 ` [PATCH 4/7] ext4: remove dead check in __ext4_new_inode Kemeng Shi
2024-08-13 12:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] ext4: move checksum length calculation of inode bitmap into ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_[verify/set] functions Kemeng Shi
2024-08-13 12:07 ` [PATCH 6/7] ext4: remove unneeded NULL check of buffer_head in ext4_mark_inode_used Kemeng Shi
2024-08-13 12:07 ` [PATCH 7/7] ext4: check buffer_verified in advance to avoid unneeded ext4_get_group_info Kemeng Shi
2024-08-15 11:13 ` Markus Elfring
2024-08-15 13:17 ` Kemeng Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240815144905.GA6039@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox