From: zhangshida <starzhangzsd@gmail.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.com
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhangshida@kylinos.cn, starzhangzsd@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix an error caused by improperly dirtied buffer
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:33:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240823013329.1996741-1-zhangshida@kylinos.cn> (raw)
From: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Hi all,
On an old kernel version(4.19, ext3, data=journal, pagesize=64k),
an assertion failure will occasionally be triggered by the line below:
---------
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
{
...
J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_dirty(bh));
/*
* The buffer on BJ_Forget list and not jbddirty means
...
}
---------
The same condition may also be applied to the lattest kernel version.
This patch set fixes it by:
1.Replace the __block_write_begin with the hoisted
ext4_block_write_begin().(patch 1)
2.Trace the user data dirtying in ext4_block_write_begin().(patch 2)
Changes since v3:
- Ditch the patch 3 in v3, because some other code paths can set the
buffer dirty:
ext4_write_begin
ext4_block_write_begin
create_empty_buffers
set_buffer_dirty
[3] Version 3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240810082814.3709867-1-zhangshida@kylinos.cn/
Changes since v2:
- Adjust the applied order of patch 1 and patch 2 in v1.
- Reword the commit message.
- Remove some superfluous logic in patch 2 and patch 3.
[2] Version 2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240809064606.3490994-2-zhangshida@kylinos.cn/
Changes since v1:
- v1 use a hack into jbd2 to fix the bug while v2 choose to journal
the dirty data in *_block_write_begin.
[1] Version 1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240720062356.2522658-1-zhangshida@kylinos.cn/
Shida Zhang (2):
ext4: hoist ext4_block_write_begin and replace the __block_write_begin
ext4: fix a potential assertion failure due to improperly dirtied
buffer
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 +++
fs/ext4/inline.c | 11 ++++++-----
fs/ext4/inode.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--
2.33.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-23 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 1:33 zhangshida [this message]
2024-08-23 1:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: hoist ext4_block_write_begin and replace the __block_write_begin zhangshida
2024-08-28 11:04 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-29 0:03 ` Eric Biggers
2024-08-29 1:28 ` Stephen Zhang
2024-08-23 1:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: fix a potential assertion failure due to improperly dirtied buffer zhangshida
2024-08-28 11:45 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-29 1:50 ` Stephen Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240823013329.1996741-1-zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
--to=starzhangzsd@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zhangshida@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox