From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
lizetao1@huawei.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 3/3] ext4: Use scoped()/scoped_guard() to drop rcu_read_lock()/unlock pair
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:34:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202408290407.XQuWf1oH-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240823061824.3323522-4-lizetao1@huawei.com>
Hi Li,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20240823]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Li-Zetao/ext4-Use-scoped-scoped_guard-to-drop-read_lock-unlock-pair/20240826-123331
base: next-20240823
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823061824.3323522-4-lizetao1%40huawei.com
patch subject: [PATCH -next 3/3] ext4: Use scoped()/scoped_guard() to drop rcu_read_lock()/unlock pair
config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240829/202408290407.XQuWf1oH-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 08e5a1de8227512d4774a534b91cb2353cef6284)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240829/202408290407.XQuWf1oH-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408290407.XQuWf1oH-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12:
In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16:
In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:23:
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2202:
include/linux/vmstat.h:504:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
504 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
505 | item];
| ~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:511:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
511 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
512 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:518:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
518 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:524:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
524 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
525 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3470:2: warning: label followed by a declaration is a C23 extension [-Wc23-extensions]
3470 | guard(rcu)();
| ^
include/linux/cleanup.h:303:2: note: expanded from macro 'guard'
303 | CLASS(_name, __UNIQUE_ID(guard))
| ^
include/linux/cleanup.h:258:2: note: expanded from macro 'CLASS'
258 | class_##_name##_t var __cleanup(class_##_name##_destructor) = \
| ^
<scratch space>:94:1: note: expanded from here
94 | class_rcu_t
| ^
5 warnings generated.
Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for OMAP2PLUS_MBOX
Depends on [n]: MAILBOX [=y] && (ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_K3)
Selected by [m]:
- TI_K3_M4_REMOTEPROC [=m] && REMOTEPROC [=y] && (ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST [=y])
vim +3470 fs/ext4/mballoc.c
3386
3387 static int ext4_mb_init_backend(struct super_block *sb)
3388 {
3389 ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
3390 ext4_group_t i;
3391 struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
3392 int err;
3393 struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
3394 struct ext4_group_info ***group_info;
3395 struct kmem_cache *cachep;
3396
3397 err = ext4_mb_alloc_groupinfo(sb, ngroups);
3398 if (err)
3399 return err;
3400
3401 sbi->s_buddy_cache = new_inode(sb);
3402 if (sbi->s_buddy_cache == NULL) {
3403 ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "can't get new inode");
3404 goto err_freesgi;
3405 }
3406 /* To avoid potentially colliding with an valid on-disk inode number,
3407 * use EXT4_BAD_INO for the buddy cache inode number. This inode is
3408 * not in the inode hash, so it should never be found by iget(), but
3409 * this will avoid confusion if it ever shows up during debugging. */
3410 sbi->s_buddy_cache->i_ino = EXT4_BAD_INO;
3411 EXT4_I(sbi->s_buddy_cache)->i_disksize = 0;
3412 for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
3413 cond_resched();
3414 desc = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, i, NULL);
3415 if (desc == NULL) {
3416 ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "can't read descriptor %u", i);
3417 goto err_freebuddy;
3418 }
3419 if (ext4_mb_add_groupinfo(sb, i, desc) != 0)
3420 goto err_freebuddy;
3421 }
3422
3423 if (ext4_has_feature_flex_bg(sb)) {
3424 /* a single flex group is supposed to be read by a single IO.
3425 * 2 ^ s_log_groups_per_flex != UINT_MAX as s_mb_prefetch is
3426 * unsigned integer, so the maximum shift is 32.
3427 */
3428 if (sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex >= 32) {
3429 ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "too many log groups per flexible block group");
3430 goto err_freebuddy;
3431 }
3432 sbi->s_mb_prefetch = min_t(uint, 1 << sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex,
3433 BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE >> (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9));
3434 sbi->s_mb_prefetch *= 8; /* 8 prefetch IOs in flight at most */
3435 } else {
3436 sbi->s_mb_prefetch = 32;
3437 }
3438 if (sbi->s_mb_prefetch > ext4_get_groups_count(sb))
3439 sbi->s_mb_prefetch = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
3440 /*
3441 * now many real IOs to prefetch within a single allocation at
3442 * CR_POWER2_ALIGNED. Given CR_POWER2_ALIGNED is an CPU-related
3443 * optimization we shouldn't try to load too many groups, at some point
3444 * we should start to use what we've got in memory.
3445 * with an average random access time 5ms, it'd take a second to get
3446 * 200 groups (* N with flex_bg), so let's make this limit 4
3447 */
3448 sbi->s_mb_prefetch_limit = sbi->s_mb_prefetch * 4;
3449 if (sbi->s_mb_prefetch_limit > ext4_get_groups_count(sb))
3450 sbi->s_mb_prefetch_limit = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
3451
3452 return 0;
3453
3454 err_freebuddy:
3455 cachep = get_groupinfo_cache(sb->s_blocksize_bits);
3456 while (i-- > 0) {
3457 struct ext4_group_info *grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, i);
3458
3459 if (grp)
3460 kmem_cache_free(cachep, grp);
3461 }
3462 i = sbi->s_group_info_size;
3463 scoped_guard(rcu) {
3464 group_info = rcu_dereference(sbi->s_group_info);
3465 while (i-- > 0)
3466 kfree(group_info[i]);
3467 }
3468 iput(sbi->s_buddy_cache);
3469 err_freesgi:
> 3470 guard(rcu)();
3471 kvfree(rcu_dereference(sbi->s_group_info));
3472 return -ENOMEM;
3473 }
3474
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 6:18 [PATCH -next 0/3] ext4: Using scope-based resource management function Li Zetao
2024-08-23 6:18 ` [PATCH -next 1/3] ext4: Use scoped()/scoped_guard() to drop read_lock()/unlock pair Li Zetao
2024-08-23 6:18 ` [PATCH -next 2/3] ext4: Use scoped()/scoped_guard() to drop write_lock()/unlock pair Li Zetao
2024-08-23 6:18 ` [PATCH -next 3/3] ext4: Use scoped()/scoped_guard() to drop rcu_read_lock()/unlock pair Li Zetao
2024-08-28 21:34 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-11-07 4:16 ` [PATCH -next 0/3] ext4: Using scope-based resource management function Theodore Ts'o
2024-11-07 21:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-11-08 11:06 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202408290407.XQuWf1oH-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizetao1@huawei.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).