From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] ext4: make extent status types exclusive
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 12:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240904102819.b5ouynw6k5nj3yff@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813123452.2824659-11-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
On Tue 13-08-24 20:34:50, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>
> Since we don't add delayed flag in unwritten extents, all of the four
> extent status types EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN, EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN,
> EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED and EXTENT_STATUS_HOLE are exclusive now, add
> assertion when storing pblock before inserting extent into status tree
> and add comment to the status definition.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents_status.h | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.h b/fs/ext4/extents_status.h
> index 3ca40f018994..7d7af642f7b2 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ enum {
> #define ES_SHIFT (sizeof(ext4_fsblk_t)*8 - ES_FLAGS)
> #define ES_MASK (~((ext4_fsblk_t)0) << ES_SHIFT)
>
> +/*
> + * Besides EXTENT_STATUS_REFERENCED, all these extent type masks
> + * are exclusive, only one type can be set at a time.
> + */
> #define EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN (1 << ES_WRITTEN_B)
> #define EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN (1 << ES_UNWRITTEN_B)
> #define EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED (1 << ES_DELAYED_B)
> @@ -51,7 +55,9 @@ enum {
> #define ES_TYPE_MASK ((ext4_fsblk_t)(EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN | \
> EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN | \
> EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED | \
> - EXTENT_STATUS_HOLE) << ES_SHIFT)
> + EXTENT_STATUS_HOLE))
> +
> +#define ES_TYPE_VALID(type) ((type) && !((type) & ((type) - 1)))
>
> struct ext4_sb_info;
> struct ext4_extent;
> @@ -156,7 +162,7 @@ static inline unsigned int ext4_es_status(struct extent_status *es)
>
> static inline unsigned int ext4_es_type(struct extent_status *es)
> {
> - return (es->es_pblk & ES_TYPE_MASK) >> ES_SHIFT;
> + return (es->es_pblk >> ES_SHIFT) & ES_TYPE_MASK;
> }
>
> static inline int ext4_es_is_written(struct extent_status *es)
> @@ -228,6 +234,8 @@ static inline void ext4_es_store_pblock_status(struct extent_status *es,
> ext4_fsblk_t pb,
> unsigned int status)
> {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!ES_TYPE_VALID(status & ES_TYPE_MASK));
> +
> es->es_pblk = (((ext4_fsblk_t)status << ES_SHIFT) & ES_MASK) |
> (pb & ~ES_MASK);
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 12:34 [PATCH v3 00/12] ext4: simplify the counting and management of delalloc reserved blocks Zhang Yi
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ext4: factor out ext4_map_create_blocks() to allocate new blocks Zhang Yi
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] ext4: optimize the EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE flag set Zhang Yi
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ext4: don't set EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED on allocated blocks Zhang Yi
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ext4: let __revise_pending() return newly inserted pendings Zhang Yi
2024-09-04 10:15 ` Jan Kara
2024-09-04 10:23 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ext4: passing block allocation information to ext4_es_insert_extent() Zhang Yi
2024-09-04 10:21 ` Jan Kara
2024-09-04 11:43 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ext4: update delalloc data reserve spcae in ext4_es_insert_extent() Zhang Yi
2024-09-04 10:22 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ext4: drop ext4_es_delayed_clu() Zhang Yi
2024-09-04 10:25 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ext4: use ext4_map_query_blocks() in ext4_map_blocks() Zhang Yi
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ext4: drop unused ext4_es_store_status() Zhang Yi
2024-09-04 10:25 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ext4: make extent status types exclusive Zhang Yi
2024-09-04 10:28 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ext4: drop ext4_es_is_delonly() Zhang Yi
2024-09-04 10:28 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-13 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ext4: drop all delonly descriptions Zhang Yi
2024-09-04 10:31 ` Jan Kara
2024-09-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] ext4: simplify the counting and management of delalloc reserved blocks Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240904102819.b5ouynw6k5nj3yff@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox