From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Fanqi Yu <fanqi.yu@columbia.edu>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Prevent successful remount as r/w after filesystem abort
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:35:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240917123545.hmyj2ho4whpn2u67@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240915210802.3835698-1-fanqi.yu@columbia.edu>
On Sun 15-09-24 17:08:04, Fanqi Yu wrote:
> While the order of writing to the shutdown and read-only flags has been
> enforced by a write memory barrier, the read side in remount does not
> have a pairing read barrier.
>
> In the event of a fs forced shutdown remounting as read-only,
> remounting it again as read-write can succeed when the flag reads are
> reordered such that sb_rdonly() returns true and
> ext4_forced_shutdown() returns false.
>
> Commit 4418e14112e3 ("ext4: Fix fsync error handling after filesystem
> abort") has added the other barriers related to these two flags but
> seems to have missed this one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fanqi Yu <fanqi.yu@columbia.edu>
Thanks for the patch but there's a changed queued in ext4 tree [1] which
removes setting of SB_RDONLY flag in emergency remount because it has other
problems as well. And after this change the memory ordering problem you
speak about is not an issue anymore.
Honza
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/commit/?h=dev&id=d3476f3dad4ad68ae5f6b008ea6591d1520da5d8
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 044135796f2b..c5d3f8969dec 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -6542,6 +6542,13 @@ static int __ext4_remount(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
> flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work);
>
> if ((bool)(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(sb)) {
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure we read the updated s_ext4_flags.
> + * Pairs with smp_wmb() in ext4_handle_error().
> + */
> + smp_rmb();
> +
> if (ext4_forced_shutdown(sb)) {
> err = -EROFS;
> goto restore_opts;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-17 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-15 21:08 [PATCH] ext4: Prevent successful remount as r/w after filesystem abort Fanqi Yu
2024-09-17 12:35 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240917123545.hmyj2ho4whpn2u67@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=fanqi.yu@columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox