linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 07/26] ext4: ext4_search_dir should return a proper error
Date: Fri,  4 Oct 2024 14:29:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241004183005.3675332-7-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241004183005.3675332-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>

[ Upstream commit cd69f8f9de280e331c9e6ff689ced0a688a9ce8f ]

ext4_search_dir currently returns -1 in case of a failure, while it returns
0 when the name is not found. In such failure cases, it should return an
error code instead.

This becomes even more important when ext4_find_inline_entry returns an
error code as well in the next commit.

-EFSCORRUPTED seems appropriate as such error code as these failures would
be caused by unexpected record lengths and is in line with other instances
of ext4_check_dir_entry failures.

In the case of ext4_dx_find_entry, the current use of ERR_BAD_DX_DIR was
left as is to reduce the risk of regressions.

Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240821152324.3621860-2-cascardo@igalia.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/ext4/namei.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index bf312f94c3bf7..39630c8cb8d38 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ static inline bool ext4_match(const struct inode *parent,
 }
 
 /*
- * Returns 0 if not found, -1 on failure, and 1 on success
+ * Returns 0 if not found, -EFSCORRUPTED on failure, and 1 on success
  */
 int ext4_search_dir(struct buffer_head *bh, char *search_buf, int buf_size,
 		    struct inode *dir, struct ext4_filename *fname,
@@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ int ext4_search_dir(struct buffer_head *bh, char *search_buf, int buf_size,
 			 * a full check */
 			if (ext4_check_dir_entry(dir, NULL, de, bh, search_buf,
 						 buf_size, offset))
-				return -1;
+				return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 			*res_dir = de;
 			return 1;
 		}
@@ -1456,7 +1456,7 @@ int ext4_search_dir(struct buffer_head *bh, char *search_buf, int buf_size,
 		de_len = ext4_rec_len_from_disk(de->rec_len,
 						dir->i_sb->s_blocksize);
 		if (de_len <= 0)
-			return -1;
+			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 		offset += de_len;
 		de = (struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *) ((char *) de + de_len);
 	}
@@ -1608,8 +1608,10 @@ static struct buffer_head *__ext4_find_entry(struct inode *dir,
 			goto cleanup_and_exit;
 		} else {
 			brelse(bh);
-			if (i < 0)
+			if (i < 0) {
+				ret = ERR_PTR(i);
 				goto cleanup_and_exit;
+			}
 		}
 	next:
 		if (++block >= nblocks)
@@ -1703,7 +1705,7 @@ static struct buffer_head * ext4_dx_find_entry(struct inode *dir,
 		if (retval == 1)
 			goto success;
 		brelse(bh);
-		if (retval == -1) {
+		if (retval < 0) {
 			bh = ERR_PTR(ERR_BAD_DX_DIR);
 			goto errout;
 		}
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-04 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241004183005.3675332-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2024-10-04 18:29 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 05/26] ext4: fix i_data_sem unlock order in ext4_ind_migrate() Sasha Levin
2024-10-04 18:29 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 06/26] ext4: avoid use-after-free in ext4_ext_show_leaf() Sasha Levin
2024-10-04 18:29 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2024-10-04 18:29 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 08/26] ext4: nested locking for xattr inode Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241004183005.3675332-7-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=cascardo@igalia.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).