From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ext4: Warn if we ever fallback to buffered-io for DIO atomic writes
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 09:16:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241025161632.GL2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c4779f1f0c8ead30f660a2cfbdf4d7cc08e405a.1729825985.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:15:53AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> iomap will not return -ENOTBLK in case of dio atomic writes. But let's
> also add a WARN_ON_ONCE and return -EIO as a safety net.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/file.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index f9516121a036..af6ebd0ac0d6 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -576,8 +576,16 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> iomap_ops = &ext4_iomap_overwrite_ops;
> ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, from, iomap_ops, &ext4_dio_write_ops,
> dio_flags, NULL, 0);
> - if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
> + if (ret == -ENOTBLK) {
> ret = 0;
> + /*
> + * iomap will never return -ENOTBLK if write fails for atomic
> + * write. But let's just add a safety net.
I think it can if the pagecache invalidation fails, so you really do
need the safety net. I suspect that the xfs version of this series
needs it too, though it may have fallen out?
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC))
> + ret = -EIO;
> + }
> +
> if (extend) {
> /*
> * We always perform extending DIO write synchronously so by
> --
> 2.46.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-25 3:45 [PATCH 0/6] ext4: Add atomic write support for DIO Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25 3:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Add statx support for atomic writes Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25 9:41 ` John Garry
2024-10-25 10:08 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 16:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 17:45 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 3:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] ext4: Check for atomic writes support in write iter Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25 9:44 ` John Garry
2024-10-25 10:33 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 16:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 17:50 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 3:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25 3:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] ext4: Warn if we ever fallback to buffered-io for DIO atomic writes Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25 16:16 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-10-25 17:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-27 22:26 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-28 1:09 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-28 5:26 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-28 8:43 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-28 18:14 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-29 22:29 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-29 23:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 3:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on " Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-25 8:52 ` John Garry
2024-10-25 9:31 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 9:59 ` John Garry
2024-10-25 10:35 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 11:07 ` John Garry
2024-10-25 11:19 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 12:23 ` John Garry
2024-10-25 12:36 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 14:04 ` John Garry
2024-10-25 14:13 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-25 18:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-26 4:35 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-10-31 21:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-04 1:52 ` Dave Chinner
2024-11-05 0:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 3:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] ext4: Add atomic write support for bigalloc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241025161632.GL2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).