From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
caiqingfu <baicaiaichibaicai@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bugzilla:219548] the kernel crashes when storing an EXT4 file system in a ZRAM device
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 09:04:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241212140437.GD1265540@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z1qSTM_Eibvw0bM5@infradead.org>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:35:40PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 12:37:39AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > More generally, any file system which uses the buffer cache, and
> > doesn't use jbd2 to control when writeback happens, I think is going
> > to be at risk with a block device which requires stable writes. The
> > only way to fix this, really, is to have the buffer cache code copy
> > the data to a bounce buffer, and then issue the write from the bounce
> > buffer.
>
> Should there be a pr_warn_once when using a file systems using the legacy
> buffer cache interfaces on a device that requires stable pages?
Well, either that, or we need to teach the buffer cache writeback code
to issue writes through a bounce buffer if the device requires stable
writes.
I'll note that this could also manifest if some program was writing to
a device that requires stable writes using buffered I/O. For example,
if they are using postgres, which won't be switching to direct I/O for
another 2-5 years (depending on how optimistic you are and how willing
enterprise customers will be to move to the latest version of
Postgres; some are stillu using very ancient Postgres for the same
reason that RHEL 7 systems based on the 3.10 kernel are still in
production use even today.)
For this particular use case, which is running VM's on
Chromium/ChromeOS, I suspect we do need to have some kind of solution
other than triggering a WARN_ON. Besides, I'd really rather not get
the kind of syzbot noise we would have by having some scheme that
would be trivially easy for syzbot to trigger. (We're not should use
WARN_ON for things that can be triggered by Stupid User Tricks,
because syzbot fuzzers can be so ingenious. :-)
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 3:58 [bugzilla:219548] the kernel crashes when storing an EXT4 file system in a ZRAM device Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-12 4:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-12 4:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-12 4:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 5:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-12-12 6:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-12-12 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-12 14:04 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2024-12-12 14:12 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-12-12 8:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241212140437.GD1265540@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baicaiaichibaicai@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox