From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78C619ABB6; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738091826; cv=none; b=Jkeydkpr3C+CfR/38Llzc51qF9RhqIJdaN3fhIGubkYmHk4436xI3PmheZkIDLY0PcRHVTZ7pOyhlnzAnND27M52epAO0MdPHb1YG8P6xZB2ckHWImjlenIejMPRm0oJrjs0M3gHl2FSMfcEs8gIMjBWlhwmwHlRxSXTv+b+Ew0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738091826; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DfjTjfSy3oOvPON9YbjE3BrQNfka9zAP1UEfPpVzvmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hnqAlIqn/kJV4xchQ9DiyKdQHl4jGBTind9nJ77OeAMtlfuhifhJZ89PLh6jWIGQESbv+Y8OCOTCkrg6F1cVzPU3yCyE+fb6nO5IztcHSMf80ydUMupvDdl6PjxVWZg249OYx9M1WZeOP6W785mJT4TGnfQOdNlvtg98ODbDLOs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nCTHWjN8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nCTHWjN8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAA2FC4CED3; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:17:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738091826; bh=DfjTjfSy3oOvPON9YbjE3BrQNfka9zAP1UEfPpVzvmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nCTHWjN8C2WVb1DU1nTmLUXs8bBOUbjE4FetYz+NFcrdK58owiLQvVUDi8lGQcaq5 zFfB+RGOlQdusTxWFt6p0dMzgbiuLpsdFAySKp/0QMK6hMv1Dj5/xYL0yeyY2Gy+Dt HZRzKylG6GoutvGX5bUmS6e16pRDLCYEuA082Fysvluo8dqyj0JfSpZ7lcE4iWbD2F wcjeqfqgdA6E7oIb2T7DCQZdNK3fcMwMsige0q4l1UH4hJbeDVFXGv7Iv4HS3APSIA aj0VmxGTIDDSuPRsAZDQLfruzbjH3PGIGmCr0HudleuSAvUSBKqnfTL/tetpoWOQIl BNbxAXjnBe1kg== Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:17:06 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Zorro Lang , Brian Foster , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/363: remove _supported_fs xfs Message-ID: <20250128191706.GQ3557695@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250128071315.676272-1-hch@lst.de> <20250128071315.676272-2-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250128071315.676272-2-hch@lst.de> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Run this test for all file systems. Just because they are broken doesn't > mean that zeroing should not be tested. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Reviewed-by: Brian Foster /me notes that this fails on btrfs, though it seems ext4 is ok..... Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --D > --- > tests/generic/363 | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/generic/363 b/tests/generic/363 > index 477c111ccb60..74226a458427 100755 > --- a/tests/generic/363 > +++ b/tests/generic/363 > @@ -13,9 +13,6 @@ _begin_fstest rw auto > > _require_test > > -# currently only xfs performs enough zeroing to satisfy fsx > -_supported_fs xfs > - > # on failure, replace -q with -d to see post-eof writes in the dump output > run_fsx "-q -S 0 -e 1 -N 100000" > > -- > 2.45.2 > >