From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] xfs: iomap CoW-based atomic write support
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:13:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250224201333.GD21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213135619.1148432-8-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 01:56:15PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> In cases of an atomic write occurs for misaligned or discontiguous disk
> blocks, we will use a CoW-based method to issue the atomic write.
>
> So, for that case, return -EAGAIN to request that the write be issued in
> CoW atomic write mode. The dio write path should detect this, similar to
> how misaligned regalar DIO writes are handled.
>
> For normal HW-based mode, when the range which we are atomic writing to
> covers a shared data extent, try to allocate a new CoW fork. However, if
> we find that what we allocated does not meet atomic write requirements
> in terms of length and alignment, then fallback on the CoW-based mode
> for the atomic write.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index ab79f0080288..c5ecfafbba60 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -795,6 +795,23 @@ imap_spans_range(
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool
> +imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(
xfs_bmap_valid_for_atomic_write()
> + struct xfs_bmbt_irec *imap,
> + xfs_fileoff_t offset_fsb,
> + xfs_fileoff_t end_fsb)
> +{
> + /* Misaligned start block wrt size */
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(imap->br_startblock, imap->br_blockcount))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Discontiguous or mixed extents */
> + if (!imap_spans_range(imap, offset_fsb, end_fsb))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static int
> xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
> struct inode *inode,
> @@ -809,12 +826,20 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
> struct xfs_bmbt_irec imap, cmap;
> xfs_fileoff_t offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset);
> xfs_fileoff_t end_fsb = xfs_iomap_end_fsb(mp, offset, length);
> + bool atomic_cow = flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW;
> + bool atomic_hw = flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW;
> int nimaps = 1, error = 0;
> bool shared = false;
> u16 iomap_flags = 0;
> + xfs_fileoff_t orig_offset_fsb;
> + xfs_fileoff_t orig_end_fsb;
> + bool needs_alloc;
> unsigned int lockmode;
> u64 seq;
>
> + orig_offset_fsb = offset_fsb;
When does offset_fsb change?
> + orig_end_fsb = end_fsb;
Set this in the variable declaration?
> +
> ASSERT(flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO));
>
> if (xfs_is_shutdown(mp))
> @@ -832,7 +857,7 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
> * COW writes may allocate delalloc space or convert unwritten COW
> * extents, so we need to make sure to take the lock exclusively here.
> */
> - if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip))
> + if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip) || atomic_cow)
> lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> else
> lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_SHARED;
> @@ -857,6 +882,22 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
> if (error)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> + if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW) {
if (atomic_cow) ?
Or really, atomic_sw?
> + error = xfs_reflink_allocate_cow(ip, &imap, &cmap, &shared,
> + &lockmode,
> + (flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) || IS_DAX(inode), true);
> + /*
> + * Don't check @shared. For atomic writes, we should error when
> + * we don't get a CoW fork.
"Get a CoW fork"? What does that mean? The cow fork should be
automatically allocated when needed, right? Or should this really read
"...when we don't get a COW mapping"?
> + */
> + if (error)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + end_fsb = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount;
> + length = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, end_fsb) - offset;
> + goto out_found_cow;
> + }
Can this be a separate ->iomap_begin (and hence iomap ops)? I am trying
to avoid the incohesion (still) plaguing most of the other iomap users.
> +
> if (imap_needs_cow(ip, flags, &imap, nimaps)) {
> error = -EAGAIN;
> if (flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
> @@ -868,13 +909,38 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
> (flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) || IS_DAX(inode), false);
> if (error)
> goto out_unlock;
> - if (shared)
> + if (shared) {
> + if (atomic_hw &&
> + !imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(&cmap,
> + orig_offset_fsb, orig_end_fsb)) {
> + error = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> goto out_found_cow;
> + }
> end_fsb = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount;
> length = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, end_fsb) - offset;
> }
>
> - if (imap_needs_alloc(inode, flags, &imap, nimaps))
> + needs_alloc = imap_needs_alloc(inode, flags, &imap, nimaps);
> +
> + if (atomic_hw) {
> + error = -EAGAIN;
> + /*
> + * Use CoW method for when we need to alloc > 1 block,
> + * otherwise we might allocate less than what we need here and
> + * have multiple mappings.
> + */
> + if (needs_alloc && orig_end_fsb - orig_offset_fsb > 1)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + if (!imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(&imap, orig_offset_fsb,
> + orig_end_fsb)) {
You only need to indent by two more tabs for a continuation line.
--D
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (needs_alloc)
> goto allocate_blocks;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-13 13:56 [PATCH v2 00/11] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] iomap: Rename IOMAP_ATOMIC -> IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW John Garry
2025-02-24 20:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:01 ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-02-24 19:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:19 ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on " John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-02-24 20:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:58 ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:02 ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] xfs: iomap " John Garry
2025-02-24 20:13 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-25 11:06 ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:07 ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-02-24 20:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:11 ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:07 ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-02-24 20:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:13 ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-02-24 20:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:17 ` John Garry
2025-02-20 7:48 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250224201333.GD21808@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox