public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
	hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] xfs: iomap CoW-based atomic write support
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:13:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250224201333.GD21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213135619.1148432-8-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 01:56:15PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> In cases of an atomic write occurs for misaligned or discontiguous disk
> blocks, we will use a CoW-based method to issue the atomic write.
> 
> So, for that case, return -EAGAIN to request that the write be issued in
> CoW atomic write mode. The dio write path should detect this, similar to
> how misaligned regalar DIO writes are handled.
> 
> For normal HW-based mode, when the range which we are atomic writing to
> covers a shared data extent, try to allocate a new CoW fork. However, if
> we find that what we allocated does not meet atomic write requirements
> in terms of length and alignment, then fallback on the CoW-based mode
> for the atomic write.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index ab79f0080288..c5ecfafbba60 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -795,6 +795,23 @@ imap_spans_range(
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static bool
> +imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(

xfs_bmap_valid_for_atomic_write()

> +	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	*imap,
> +	xfs_fileoff_t		offset_fsb,
> +	xfs_fileoff_t		end_fsb)
> +{
> +	/* Misaligned start block wrt size */
> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(imap->br_startblock, imap->br_blockcount))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Discontiguous or mixed extents */
> +	if (!imap_spans_range(imap, offset_fsb, end_fsb))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>  	struct inode		*inode,
> @@ -809,12 +826,20 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>  	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	imap, cmap;
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset);
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		end_fsb = xfs_iomap_end_fsb(mp, offset, length);
> +	bool			atomic_cow = flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW;
> +	bool			atomic_hw = flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW;
>  	int			nimaps = 1, error = 0;
>  	bool			shared = false;
>  	u16			iomap_flags = 0;
> +	xfs_fileoff_t		orig_offset_fsb;
> +	xfs_fileoff_t		orig_end_fsb;
> +	bool			needs_alloc;
>  	unsigned int		lockmode;
>  	u64			seq;
>  
> +	orig_offset_fsb = offset_fsb;

When does offset_fsb change?

> +	orig_end_fsb = end_fsb;

Set this in the variable declaration?

> +
>  	ASSERT(flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO));
>  
>  	if (xfs_is_shutdown(mp))
> @@ -832,7 +857,7 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>  	 * COW writes may allocate delalloc space or convert unwritten COW
>  	 * extents, so we need to make sure to take the lock exclusively here.
>  	 */
> -	if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip))
> +	if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip) || atomic_cow)
>  		lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
>  	else
>  		lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_SHARED;
> @@ -857,6 +882,22 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
> +	if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW) {

	if (atomic_cow) ?

Or really, atomic_sw?

> +		error = xfs_reflink_allocate_cow(ip, &imap, &cmap, &shared,
> +				&lockmode,
> +				(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) || IS_DAX(inode), true);
> +		/*
> +		 * Don't check @shared. For atomic writes, we should error when
> +		 * we don't get a CoW fork.

"Get a CoW fork"?  What does that mean?  The cow fork should be
automatically allocated when needed, right?  Or should this really read
"...when we don't get a COW mapping"?

> +		 */
> +		if (error)
> +			goto out_unlock;
> +
> +		end_fsb = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount;
> +		length = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, end_fsb) - offset;
> +		goto out_found_cow;
> +	}

Can this be a separate ->iomap_begin (and hence iomap ops)?  I am trying
to avoid the incohesion (still) plaguing most of the other iomap users.

> +
>  	if (imap_needs_cow(ip, flags, &imap, nimaps)) {
>  		error = -EAGAIN;
>  		if (flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
> @@ -868,13 +909,38 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>  				(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) || IS_DAX(inode), false);
>  		if (error)
>  			goto out_unlock;
> -		if (shared)
> +		if (shared) {
> +			if (atomic_hw &&
> +			    !imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(&cmap,
> +					orig_offset_fsb, orig_end_fsb)) {
> +				error = -EAGAIN;
> +				goto out_unlock;
> +			}
>  			goto out_found_cow;
> +		}
>  		end_fsb = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount;
>  		length = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, end_fsb) - offset;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (imap_needs_alloc(inode, flags, &imap, nimaps))
> +	needs_alloc = imap_needs_alloc(inode, flags, &imap, nimaps);
> +
> +	if (atomic_hw) {
> +		error = -EAGAIN;
> +		/*
> +		 * Use CoW method for when we need to alloc > 1 block,
> +		 * otherwise we might allocate less than what we need here and
> +		 * have multiple mappings.
> +		*/
> +		if (needs_alloc && orig_end_fsb - orig_offset_fsb > 1)
> +			goto out_unlock;
> +
> +		if (!imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(&imap, orig_offset_fsb,
> +						orig_end_fsb)) {

You only need to indent by two more tabs for a continuation line.

--D

> +			goto out_unlock;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (needs_alloc)
>  		goto allocate_blocks;
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13 13:56 [PATCH v2 00/11] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] iomap: Rename IOMAP_ATOMIC -> IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW John Garry
2025-02-24 20:23   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:01     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:29       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-02-24 19:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:19     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:33       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on " John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-02-24 20:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:58     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:02         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] xfs: iomap " John Garry
2025-02-24 20:13   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-25 11:06     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:47       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:07         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-02-24 20:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:11     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:50       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:07         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-02-24 20:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:13     ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-02-24 20:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:17     ` John Garry
2025-02-20  7:48 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250224201333.GD21808@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox