public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
	hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter()
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:24:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250224202456.GG21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213135619.1148432-3-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 01:56:10PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Currently the size of atomic write allowed is fixed at the blocksize.
> 
> To start to lift this restriction, refactor xfs_get_atomic_write_attr()
> to into a helper - xfs_report_atomic_write() - and use that helper to
> find the per-inode atomic write limits and check according to that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>

Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 12 +++++-------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index f7a7d89c345e..258c82cbce12 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -853,14 +853,12 @@ xfs_file_write_iter(
>  		return xfs_file_dax_write(iocb, from);
>  
>  	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Currently only atomic writing of a single FS block is
> -		 * supported. It would be possible to atomic write smaller than
> -		 * a FS block, but there is no requirement to support this.
> -		 * Note that iomap also does not support this yet.
> -		 */
> -		if (ocount != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
> +		unsigned int	unit_min, unit_max;
> +
> +		xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(ip, &unit_min, &unit_max);
> +		if (ocount < unit_min || ocount > unit_max)
>  			return -EINVAL;
> +
>  		ret = generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index 40289fe6f5b2..ea79fb246e33 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -600,15 +600,29 @@ xfs_report_dioalign(
>  		stat->dio_offset_align = stat->dio_read_offset_align;
>  }
>  
> +void
> +xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(
> +	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
> +	unsigned int		*unit_min,
> +	unsigned int		*unit_max)
> +{
> +	if (!xfs_inode_can_atomicwrite(ip)) {
> +		*unit_min = *unit_max = 0;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	*unit_min = *unit_max = ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  xfs_report_atomic_write(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
>  	struct kstat		*stat)
>  {
> -	unsigned int		unit_min = 0, unit_max = 0;
> +	unsigned int		unit_min, unit_max;
> +
> +	xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(ip, &unit_min, &unit_max);
>  
> -	if (xfs_inode_can_atomicwrite(ip))
> -		unit_min = unit_max = ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
>  	generic_fill_statx_atomic_writes(stat, unit_min, unit_max);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h
> index 3c1a2605ffd2..ce7bdeb9a79c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.h
> @@ -19,5 +19,8 @@ int xfs_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
>  extern void xfs_setup_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>  extern void xfs_setup_iops(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>  extern void xfs_diflags_to_iflags(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool init);
> +void xfs_get_atomic_write_attr(struct xfs_inode *ip,
> +		unsigned int *unit_min, unsigned int *unit_max);
> +
>  
>  #endif /* __XFS_IOPS_H__ */
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13 13:56 [PATCH v2 00/11] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] iomap: Rename IOMAP_ATOMIC -> IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW John Garry
2025-02-24 20:23   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:24   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:01     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:29       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-02-24 19:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:19     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:33       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on " John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-02-24 20:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:58     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:02         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] xfs: iomap " John Garry
2025-02-24 20:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:06     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:47       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:07         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-02-24 20:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:11     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:50       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:07         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-02-24 20:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:13     ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-02-24 20:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:17     ` John Garry
2025-02-20  7:48 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250224202456.GG21808@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox