public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, cem@kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@oracle.com,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 12/12] xfs: update atomic write limits
Date: Tue,  8 Apr 2025 10:42:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250408104209.1852036-13-john.g.garry@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408104209.1852036-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

Update the limits returned from xfs_get_atomic_write_{min, max, max_opt)().

No reflink support always means no CoW-based atomic writes.

For updating xfs_get_atomic_write_min(), we support blocksize only and that
depends on HW or reflink support.

For updating xfs_get_atomic_write_max(), for rtvol or no reflink, we are
limited to blocksize but only if HW support. Otherwise we are limited to
combined limit in mp->m_atomic_write_unit_max.

For updating xfs_get_atomic_write_max_opt(), ultimately we are limited by
the bdev atomic write limit. If xfs_get_atomic_write_max() does not report
> 1x blocksize, then just continue to report 0 as before.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 81a377f65aa3..d1ddbc4a98c3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ xfs_file_open(
 	if (xfs_is_shutdown(XFS_M(inode->i_sb)))
 		return -EIO;
 	file->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
-	if (xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite(XFS_I(inode)))
+	if (xfs_get_atomic_write_min(XFS_I(inode)))
 		file->f_mode |= FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE;
 	return generic_file_open(inode, file);
 }
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index 3b5aa39dbfe9..894f56f1a830 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@ -605,27 +605,52 @@ unsigned int
 xfs_get_atomic_write_min(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
 {
-	if (!xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite(ip))
-		return 0;
+	if (xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite(ip) || xfs_has_reflink(ip->i_mount))
+		return ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
 
-	return ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 unsigned int
 xfs_get_atomic_write_max(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
 {
-	if (!xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite(ip))
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
+
+	/*
+	 * If no reflink, then best we can do is 1x block as no CoW fallback
+	 * for when HW offload not possible.
+	 *
+	 * rtvol is not commonly used and supporting large atomic writes
+	 * would also be complicated to support there, so limit to a single
+	 * block for now.
+	 */
+	if (!xfs_has_reflink(mp) || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) {
+		if (xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite(ip))
+			return ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
 		return 0;
+	}
 
-	return ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
+	/*
+	 * Even though HW support could be larger (than CoW), we rely on
+	 * CoW-based method as a fallback for when HW-based is not possible,
+	 * so always limit at m_atomic_write_unit_max (which is evaluated
+	 * according to CoW-based limit.
+	 */
+	return XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_atomic_write_unit_max);
 }
 
 unsigned int
 xfs_get_atomic_write_max_opt(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
 {
-	return 0;
+	struct xfs_buftarg	*target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
+
+	/* if the max is 1x block, then just keep behaviour that opt is 0 */
+	if (xfs_get_atomic_write_max(ip) <= ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
+		return 0;
+
+	return min(xfs_get_atomic_write_max(ip), target->bt_bdev_awu_max);
 }
 
 static void
-- 
2.31.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-08 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-08 10:41 [PATCH v6 00/12] large atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2025-04-08 10:41 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] fs: add atomic write unit max opt to statx John Garry
2025-04-09  2:23   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09 10:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-08 10:41 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] xfs: add helpers to compute log item overhead John Garry
2025-04-08 22:50   ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-08 23:21     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09  2:25   ` [PATCH v6.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09  2:25   ` [PATCH v6.1 RFC 02.1/12] xfs: add helpers to compute transaction reservation for finishing intent items Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] xfs: rename xfs_inode_can_atomicwrite() -> xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite() John Garry
2025-04-09  2:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09 10:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] xfs: allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] xfs: refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] xfs: refine atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] xfs: add xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] xfs: add large atomic writes checks in xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] xfs: commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] xfs: add xfs_compute_atomic_write_unit_max() John Garry
2025-04-08 21:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 22:47   ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-09  0:41     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09  5:30       ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-09  8:15         ` John Garry
2025-04-09 22:49           ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-10  8:58             ` John Garry
2025-04-09 23:46         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 10:42 ` John Garry [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250408104209.1852036-13-john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox